Re: UP and Wasco County
Author: Big Train
Date: 11-04-2016 - 15:05

In case the link doesn't work.


Following a Wednesday evening appeal hearing that stretched over five hours, the Wasco County Board of Commissioners reversed an earlier decision by the county’s planning commission and voted unanimously to deny Union Pacific’s application to add several miles of new track through the Mosier area.

#Union Pacific has been seeking regulatory approval to expand an existing railroad siding east and west from Mosier. The “Mosier Siding Extension Project” calls for a total of 4.02 miles of second mainline track to be added at both ends of an existing 1.35-mile siding at Mosier. The extended track is designed to allow trains to pass and keep moving rather than, as is often the case now, being required to stop on the siding in Mosier and wait for other trains to go by.

#Railroad officials have described the route through Mosier as a “bottleneck.”

#At the end of the hearing, held Nov. 2 at the Columbia Gorge Discovery Center, the commissioners cited the negative impact on tribal treaty rights in rejecting UP’s application.

#The Nov. 2 hearing was designed to consider three separate appeals of the Wasco County Planning Commission’s 5-2 vote on Sept. 26 to approve the project, with 44 conditions. The appeals were from the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and a joint filing from Friends of the Columbia Gorge/Columbia Riverkeeper/Physicians for Social Responsibility.

#Union Pacific also appealed two conditions in the planning commission’s decision that the railroad believed unduly burdened the railroad’s ability to transport interstate commerce.

#The Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act and Wasco County rules allow railroads to make infrastructure enhancements. Railroad projects are considered a permitted use, but are subject to conditional use provisions.

#During the hearing, County Commissioner Scott Hege asked UP representatives if the track extension could be shortened or taken in just one direction from Mosier.

#“Shortening the project would still leave a bottleneck,” said Clint Schelbitzki, UP’s director of public affairs. “If we’re not able to have the full mileage, we’d still end up with stopped trains at the siding.”

#Schelbitzki added that the siding would increase the “fluid capacity” of the rail line by an additional five to seven trains per day, meaning those trains would not need to stop in Mosier to wait for another train to pass.

#He added that did not necessarily mean there would be more trains using the line, only that traffic would more efficiently move over the route.

#Hege also asked if Mosier residents should expect more noise if the track extension is allowed.

#“We don’t think there would be a significant increase in noise,” said Wes Lujan, UP’s vice president of public affairs.

#When the commissioners asked if the project would result in an increased number of trains and whether the railroad had considered using a route other than the gorge to move goods through the area, Bob Belt, assistant vice president of law for UP, said the county had no authority to regulate those factors.

#“Regulating the number of trains is pre-empted by federal law, and if the county tells us to send trains somewhere else, we respectfully submit that also is prohibited by federal law,” Belt said.

#One of the proposed conditions the planning commission removed when it earlier voted to allow the railroad to go forward with the project was a requirement that coal cars moving through the area be covered.

#Railroad officials pointed out that covering coal loads is not required by the Surface Transportation Board or the Federal Railroad Administration, and noted that it was a moot issue in any case.

#“At this time we do not haul coal west of Boardman,” Lujan said.

#Boardman is about 80 miles east of The Dalles.

#Amber Penn-Roco, a member of the Chehalis Tribe, spoke on behalf of the tribes during the hearing. She said the project would further impact tribal access to the river.

#“This interferes with our treaty rights,” she explained. “Tribal members hunt, fish, and gather at traditional places, and the proposed railroad expansion has the potential to impact our rights to hunt and fish in accustomed areas.”

#Penn-Roco said increased train traffic could restrict access to the river and make for unsafe conditions.

#“It increases the risk of injury or death, and increase the chance of derailments. These impacts must be addressed,” she said. “At many fishing sites, the only access is by crossing train tracks.”

#Arlene Burns, mayor of Mosier, told the county commissioners she was adamantly opposed to extending the tracks through Mosier, where a Union Pacific oil train derailed and burned in June.

#“What two tracks will do is increase risks, turning a bottleneck into a spillway and make our town unlivable during construction and beyond,” Burns said. “We all fear double-tracking will have severe consequences for our town and would increase the capacity of volatile products going through. The bottom line for us is, one line is enough.”

#When Hege pointed out there seemed to be conflict between various federal laws that respectively protected tribal rights on one hand and protected railroad operations on the other, Angie Brewer, the county’s planning director, replied that the county needed to do what was right by Wasco County’s rules.

#“Our job is to implement our rules to the best of our ability,” Brewer advised the commissioners.

#The commissioners all said the impact on treaty rights was a key issue.

#“I cannot see how this doesn’t adversely affect treaty rights,” Hege said.

#Commission Chair Rod Runyon agreed, and suggested putting back in the conditions the planning commission had taken out.

#“I’m leaning in that direction,” he said.

#The four conditions the county board wanted back in the document require all coal cars moving through Wasco County to be covered; require UP to stay within its existing range of 20 to 30 trains per day; stipulate that UP must adhere to all FRA safety standards; and mandate that the proposed development could not result in increased net volume of rail traffic.

#Brewer said that approach made sense.

#“From the staff’s perspective, it comes down to treaty rights. Adding those (conditions) back in would address a lot,” Brewer said.

#“If you feel treaty rights are impacted, the project must be denied.”

#Commissioner Steve Kramer said he believed reversing the planning commission’s decision and denying the railroad’s application seemed to be the proper course.

#“Reverse and deny is more appropriate,” Kramer explained. “We need to add the conditions back in so it’s not remanded to us.”

#Runyon made a motion to deny the UP application on treaty rights grounds. The commissioners then voted 3-0 to approve the motion.

#The commissioners will meet on Nov. 10 at the Wasco County Courthouse at 5:30 p.m. to take a final vote on the application.

#“This is a tentative denial,” Runyon said on Thursday. “No additional material will be considered.”

#In the wake of the vote by the commissioners, UP officials said they remained committed to the project.

#“For many years, we have consistently and proactively communicated about the siding project to Mosier residents, as well as to state, local and tribal entities,” said Justin Jacobs, director of corporate relations for UP.

#“We plan to continue working with the community to understand its concerns and address them moving forward. Our project aims to reduce the number of idling trains in Mosier, The Dalles, Hood River and other gorge communities while mitigating train traffic delays to more efficiently transport the goods American families and businesses use daily.”
.













Hot Jobs

View all listings

◾OVH (LOGO)
◾ASSISTANT GIRLS
◾ASSISTANT TRACK COACH
◾CASE MANAGER/
◾CATTLE TRUCK DRIVER
◾EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANT II
◾EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANT III
◾ELL/ESL Educational Assistant II
◾HEAD TRACK COACH
◾Office Assistant II
◾POLICE OFFICER POSITION OPENING
◾RDO LOGO
◾Supervisor 2 (Court Supervisor)
◾TITLE I READING
◾TRAFFIC MANAGER
◾CMA/LPN
◾CNA
◾MENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
◾OVH (LOGO)
◾ASSISTANT GIRLS



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  UP and Wasco County Big Train 11-04-2016 - 13:55
  Re: UP and Wasco County Big Train 11-04-2016 - 15:05
  Re: UP and Wasco County Erik H. 11-04-2016 - 18:51
  Re: UP and Wasco County stash 11-04-2016 - 20:26
  Re: UP and Wasco County SP5103 11-05-2016 - 09:03
  Re: UP and Wasco County Shortline Sammie 11-05-2016 - 11:09
  Re: UP and Wasco County OT Local 11-05-2016 - 11:05
  Re: UP and Wasco County Shortline Sammie 11-05-2016 - 11:11
  Re: UP and Wasco County Kenn 11-05-2016 - 15:58
  Re: UP and Wasco County Robert 11-06-2016 - 07:45
  Re: UP and Wasco County Pdxrailtransit I 11-06-2016 - 17:03
  Re: UP and Wasco County George Andrews 11-06-2016 - 19:48


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **              **  ********  **    **  ******** 
 **              **  **        ***   **  **       
 **              **  **        ****  **  **       
 **              **  ******    ** ** **  ******   
 **        **    **  **        **  ****  **       
 **        **    **  **        **   ***  **       
 ********   ******   ********  **    **  ******** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com