Re: SMART One person crews
Author: Dr Zarkoff
Date: 09-24-2017 - 16:46

> If they went to one person would the trains have to be modified to allow doors to opened by the engineer?

Some operations have already doing this for years (Sounder, VRE possibly, etc.). If you ever get the chance to look at a desktop in one of the second group of CDTX F-59s, there is a rectangular plate over to the right of the brake valve which covers the opening meant for these controls. Caltrans never intended to purchase the controls (and didn't). The reason for the cover plate is that the locomotives were an add-on to an existing order which did. It was far cheaper (and faster) to cover the holes than re-engineer the control stand to leave out the opening (has to do with the red tape of the procurement process and the arm and leg the suppliers charge for design changes these days).



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  SMART exceeding projected ridership Mike Pechner 09-21-2017 - 11:08
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership HUTCH 7.62 09-21-2017 - 12:24
  Re: SMART needs to place a order for the middle car DAVID L 09-21-2017 - 12:49
  Re: SMART needs to place a order for the middle car YeOldTrain 09-21-2017 - 12:55
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Commenter 09-21-2017 - 12:58
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Pete 09-21-2017 - 13:02
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Dave L 09-21-2017 - 13:44
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Dickie 09-21-2017 - 16:24
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Mike Pechner 09-21-2017 - 16:42
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Dickie 09-21-2017 - 16:48
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Commenter 09-21-2017 - 17:00
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Dr Zarkoff 09-24-2017 - 16:33
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership fkrock 09-22-2017 - 09:25
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Dickie 09-22-2017 - 13:33
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Not so Fast Ridership Expert 09-23-2017 - 09:52
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Not so Fast synonymouse 09-23-2017 - 21:17
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Not so Fast Commenter 09-23-2017 - 22:02
  Re: SMART exceeding projected ridership Not so Fast synonymouse 09-24-2017 - 09:50
  Re: SMART Catenary? And, weekend demand.....? BOB2 09-24-2017 - 12:08
  Re: SMART One person crews wsabo 09-24-2017 - 09:57
  Re: SMART One person crews Dr Zarkoff 09-24-2017 - 16:46


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **  ********   ********   **     **  **     ** 
       **  **     **  **     **  **     **   **   **  
       **  **     **  **     **  **     **    ** **   
       **  ********   ********   **     **     ***    
 **    **  **         **     **  **     **    ** **   
 **    **  **         **     **  **     **   **   **  
  ******   **         ********    *******   **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com