 |
Re: HSR is loud
Author: synonymouse
Date: 04-01-2018 - 14:20
If I interpreted the article correctly the family said there was some sort of earthen wall, but to hide the tracks. Which they also said obviously did not work.
PB was talking up running CAHSR at something like 200mph right thru towns on viaducts. Of course this would be the poor side of town, not where the politicians live.
This family in France made a poor decision to buy based on trust and optimism; but in California property owners next to the HSR ROW("riverains")have the chance to limit their losses and sell out now. AFAIK real estate laws do not require any kind of "disclaimer" on this type of thing in the public domain and knowledge; eminent domain carried out by a government agency is not their fault and beyond their ability to anticipate. The onus is on Jerry Brown.
"California Civil Code Section (CCCS) 1710.2 basically states that a death on a property must be disclosed if it occurred within three years of an offer on the property. According to CCCS 1710.2, a seller doesn’t have to disclose a death on a property if it occurred after the three-year time frame.
Real estate disclosure law also stipulates that a seller and his/her agent must disclose any fact of which they have knowledge that could be material to a buyer’s decision to purchase the property. Facts about the property are considered material if their disclosure would affect the value or desirability of the property. Is a death on a property a material fact that affects the value or desirability of the property? It could be."
Future JerryRail noise is "facts about the property..."?
PB was talking up running CAHSR at something like 200mph right thru towns on viaducts. Of course this would be the poor side of town, not where the politicians live.
This family in France made a poor decision to buy based on trust and optimism; but in California property owners next to the HSR ROW("riverains")have the chance to limit their losses and sell out now. AFAIK real estate laws do not require any kind of "disclaimer" on this type of thing in the public domain and knowledge; eminent domain carried out by a government agency is not their fault and beyond their ability to anticipate. The onus is on Jerry Brown.
"California Civil Code Section (CCCS) 1710.2 basically states that a death on a property must be disclosed if it occurred within three years of an offer on the property. According to CCCS 1710.2, a seller doesn’t have to disclose a death on a property if it occurred after the three-year time frame.
Real estate disclosure law also stipulates that a seller and his/her agent must disclose any fact of which they have knowledge that could be material to a buyer’s decision to purchase the property. Facts about the property are considered material if their disclosure would affect the value or desirability of the property. Is a death on a property a material fact that affects the value or desirability of the property? It could be."
Future JerryRail noise is "facts about the property..."?
