 |
 |
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
Author: Hot Steamer
Date: 11-05-2018 - 15:14
jst3751 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As for the responses about where to get the cars,
> Matt never said anything about a Daylight consist.
> He is just asking about the engine.
>
> Does BNSF have some sort of trackage rights on the
> coast line?
>
> IF it could be run as a BNSF train then there is
> an extremely slim chance that it could happen.
Good point... it probably would take an act of BNSF making this request to the UP for some special move or trip with their business train. And as stated before, then they would have to deal with Ed Dickens wanting to be on the engine while traveling on UP lines.
-------------------------------------------------------
> As for the responses about where to get the cars,
> Matt never said anything about a Daylight consist.
> He is just asking about the engine.
>
> Does BNSF have some sort of trackage rights on the
> coast line?
>
> IF it could be run as a BNSF train then there is
> an extremely slim chance that it could happen.
Good point... it probably would take an act of BNSF making this request to the UP for some special move or trip with their business train. And as stated before, then they would have to deal with Ed Dickens wanting to be on the engine while traveling on UP lines.
| Subject | Written By | Date/Time (PST) |
|---|---|---|
 SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Matt Morris | 11-05-2018 - 08:14 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Hot Steamer | 11-05-2018 - 09:37 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Cprr | 11-05-2018 - 10:30 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Tony Johnson | 11-05-2018 - 11:25 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Hot Water | 11-05-2018 - 11:31 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Railbaron | 11-05-2018 - 11:52 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
mdo | 11-05-2018 - 12:23 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
jst3751 | 11-05-2018 - 11:54 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Cold Water | 11-05-2018 - 12:20 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
OPRRMS | 11-05-2018 - 12:32 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line |
Hot Steamer | 11-05-2018 - 15:14 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
J Mann | 11-05-2018 - 12:20 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Stanford | 11-05-2018 - 15:29 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Sal Cupertine | 11-05-2018 - 16:58 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
HUTCH 7.62 | 11-05-2018 - 17:01 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Matt Morris | 11-05-2018 - 18:57 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Hot Water | 11-05-2018 - 19:20 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
George Andrews | 11-05-2018 - 20:25 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Hot Water | 11-05-2018 - 20:44 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Arlen Sheldrake | 11-05-2018 - 22:32 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
theconductor | 11-05-2018 - 23:36 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
FEF-3 | 11-06-2018 - 11:38 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Hot Steamer | 11-06-2018 - 09:52 |
|
Re: SP 4449 and the SP coast line
|
Bubba | 11-06-2018 - 11:44 |