Dr. Furshlugginer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd like to continue this thread but I'm losing
> what little interest I managed to initially drum
> up. The Christian Science Monitor is probably one
> of the last, if not THE last, publication I would
> look to for any sort of clear-headed information.
> I dislike commercial pot growers, but no more so
> than commercial almond growers, grape growers,
> rice growers, etc.

That's an incredibly lame response.

1) You shoot the messenger (the Christian Science Monitor) rather than explain what is incorrect.

2) If you didn't want to read the Christian Science Monitor, there was another source provided.

3) There were many other sources on the internet conveying similar information.

4) You made an assertion that the NWP caused far more pollution than pot growers, but provided no information to back up your claim.

5) It doesn't matter if you "dislike" commercial pot growers or any other kinds of growers. What matters is your claim that the NWP polluted more than current pot growers, but your inability and/or unwillingness to back up your claim with citations of any studies.