A Cascadia bullet train: Time to move to next level or ‘kill this thing right now’?
Author: Sino mouse (aka Eric Swallowwell)
Date: 12-10-2020 - 21:25

Defund the police and build the biggestest fastestest something. The Sinocrats run Washington state, so a Chinese firm will get the contract, no doubt.

[www.opb.org]

The new study by hired consultants examined governance and financing options. This report builds on previous state-sponsored studies that asserted there are sufficient demand and a business case for trains running at up to 250 miles per hour between Portland, Seattle and Vancouver, British Columbia.


The consultants’ report said one of the first jobs of the coordinating entity should be to select a technology for the “ultra-high-speed ground transportation” corridor. The study laid out multiple options including traditional high-speed rail, magnetic levitation trains or a hyperloop, in which passengers zip along in capsules that are propelled electrically down sealed low air pressure tubes. In any case, the aspired travel times are about one hour between Portland and Seattle and another hour from Seattle to Vancouver, British Columbia.

Another job of the coordinating entity would be to build a broader coalition of support and "ensure deep and equitable local engagement across the corridor."


This latest study did not include updated cost estimates for the enormous acquisition and construction cost of a new, roughly 300-mile rail corridor. A previous feasibility study in 2018 estimated a $24 billion to $42 billion price tag to build a high-speed rail line on a dedicated right-of-way from Portland to Vancouver, British Columbia. The earlier feasibility study determined a need for extensive tunneling and an elevated trackway.

The study authors lean heavily on securing limited state and federal funding to make the math work. The calculations also assume private contributions from train operators or beneficiaries. The study said some construction costs could be financed with borrowing that would be repaid with future ticket revenue. The consultants also suggested the states and province could levy a regional property tax around station locations to raise significant amounts of new revenue.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  A Cascadia bullet train: Time to move to next level or ‘kill this thing right now’? Sino mouse (aka Eric Swallowwell) 12-10-2020 - 21:25
  Cascadia rail funds Bezos & Gates, na. Not when you got S 12-11-2020 - 07:05
  Re: Cascadia rail funds got Stormy 12-11-2020 - 07:06
  Lib troll of many names, weirder than pdt? Stockton grade separation committee 12-11-2020 - 16:40
  Re: Lib troll of many names, weirder than pdt? uh oh, Michael Avenatti is a rail fan 12-11-2020 - 17:18
  Re: A Cascadia bullet train: Time to move to next level or ‘kill this thing right now’? FUD 12-11-2020 - 10:02
  Chinese Manufacturing LES 12-11-2020 - 10:20
  Re: Chinese Manufacturing Skeeter 12-11-2020 - 10:24
  Re: Chinese Manufacturing FUD 12-11-2020 - 22:40
  Re: Chinese Manufacturing LES 12-12-2020 - 03:29
  WSDOTs version LES 12-11-2020 - 10:05
  Re: WSDOTs version FUD 12-11-2020 - 10:28
  where ya going to build it reality check 12-11-2020 - 10:45
  A lot of time on Gates hands since he retired. LES 12-11-2020 - 11:33
  Re: A lot of time on Gates hands since he retired. reality check 12-12-2020 - 12:16
  Private contributions Commenter 12-11-2020 - 11:34
  Vote NO on another crazy train my 2 cents 12-11-2020 - 12:11
  Re: Vote NO on another crazy train my 2 cents 12-11-2020 - 12:29
  Re: Vote NO on another crazy train my 2 cents 12-11-2020 - 12:30
  Re: Vote NO on another crazy train LES 12-11-2020 - 12:37
  When considering the alternatives LES 12-11-2020 - 12:29
  Re: When considering the alternatives Erik H. 12-11-2020 - 17:36
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. BOB2 12-11-2020 - 19:50
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. LES 12-11-2020 - 20:54
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. FUD 12-11-2020 - 22:30
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. LES 12-12-2020 - 03:24
  Bill Gates reference LES 12-12-2020 - 04:29
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. EU812 12-11-2020 - 22:41
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. BOB2 12-12-2020 - 02:00
  Re: When considering the alternatives You should do needs based planning. LES 12-12-2020 - 03:41
  200 mph reference LES 12-12-2020 - 03:47
  Re: When considering the alternatives LES 12-11-2020 - 20:29
  Re: When considering the alternatives FUD 12-12-2020 - 06:36
  Re: When considering the alternatives LEL 12-12-2020 - 07:18
  Re: When considering the alternatives Erik H. 12-13-2020 - 21:41
  Re: When considering the alternatives-Induced demand? BOB2 12-14-2020 - 00:01
  Re: When considering the alternatives-Induced demand? FUD 12-14-2020 - 06:01


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******   ********  **    **        **  ******** 
 **    **     **      **  **         **     **    
 **           **       ****          **     **    
 **           **        **           **     **    
 **           **        **     **    **     **    
 **    **     **        **     **    **     **    
  ******      **        **      ******      **    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com