 |
Re: Here's a "reality check"? They told a lot of people a lot of lies.... Young Pole Burner? LMAO.... Yep......
Author: BOB2
Date: 07-23-2021 - 19:42
Re: Support/Opposition for High Speed Rail
Author: BOB2
[i]Re: Support/Opposition for High Speed Rail
Author: BOB2
Date: 09-21-2008 - 11:37
"Also, due to lots of work by the rail advocacy community, the enabling legislation for Proposition 1A, known as AB 3034 was substantially rewritten before final adoption to include oversight.
This includes mechanisms to make sure that there was technical and regional oversight to the project development. In effect, that it is vetted by those regional stakeholders, as a reality check.
This will help assure the projects built are not just useless segments that would indeed be boondoggles, but are part of a strategy that integrates with and is mutually supportive of local rail improvements and systems."
[/i
Ask the local Sou Cal Agencies about that....
Yep, the rail advocacy community was lied to, just like the voters.... Which is why I have no loyalty to defend the indefensible... Unlike an obsessive troll with mental problems who can only obsess over me...
While the CAHSRA put in these window dressing provisons. And, the peer review process finally doing actual passenger modeling of alternative routes and stations, has finally unmasked the sheer stupidy of Pacheco, the "runaway money train" still needs to be restructured and the parameters changed to stop the bleeding...
One reason for that decision at some of the rail organizations, thinking that an obsessive mentally disturbed obsessive troll wouldn't likely understand, is that with any normal Federal funding portion (expected even then to be part of this project) would have normally triggered a number of checks, which the FRA never required, unlike FTA and FHWA.... And, someone like you, who's never done a days work on anything like this, who's an obsessive mental case, doesn;t really care, do you sweetpea?
We know for sure that you're not Old Pole Burner.... Since you're the troll of many names, isn't that right sweetpea?
Author: BOB2
[i]Re: Support/Opposition for High Speed Rail
Author: BOB2
Date: 09-21-2008 - 11:37
"Also, due to lots of work by the rail advocacy community, the enabling legislation for Proposition 1A, known as AB 3034 was substantially rewritten before final adoption to include oversight.
This includes mechanisms to make sure that there was technical and regional oversight to the project development. In effect, that it is vetted by those regional stakeholders, as a reality check.
This will help assure the projects built are not just useless segments that would indeed be boondoggles, but are part of a strategy that integrates with and is mutually supportive of local rail improvements and systems."
[/i
Ask the local Sou Cal Agencies about that....
Yep, the rail advocacy community was lied to, just like the voters.... Which is why I have no loyalty to defend the indefensible... Unlike an obsessive troll with mental problems who can only obsess over me...
While the CAHSRA put in these window dressing provisons. And, the peer review process finally doing actual passenger modeling of alternative routes and stations, has finally unmasked the sheer stupidy of Pacheco, the "runaway money train" still needs to be restructured and the parameters changed to stop the bleeding...
One reason for that decision at some of the rail organizations, thinking that an obsessive mentally disturbed obsessive troll wouldn't likely understand, is that with any normal Federal funding portion (expected even then to be part of this project) would have normally triggered a number of checks, which the FRA never required, unlike FTA and FHWA.... And, someone like you, who's never done a days work on anything like this, who's an obsessive mental case, doesn;t really care, do you sweetpea?
We know for sure that you're not Old Pole Burner.... Since you're the troll of many names, isn't that right sweetpea?
