BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I see that I upset the mentally ill sociopathic troll who sends unsolicitied pornographic images to AP by pointing out that such behavior is a violation of the law.

Okay, now tell us what constitutes a "pornographic image". The picture that was posted wasn't any more obscene than what one sees during a gay pride parade in the Castro district. Funny how you're such a prude now but you are probably supportive of gay dudes indoctrinating little kids at a Drag Queen Story Hour session. What's with the duplicity? You have some explaining to do.

> I think it would be a shame, it they did end up arrest a poor disturbed out of control mentally ill sociopathic troll, before that person has a chance to the get the kind of help they need for your mental illness that causes them to engage in this kind of illegal behavior.

This is the outfit that posted that pic on the Internet: [peacemoonbeam.typepad.com] Not me. Do I have to draw you a ven diagram so you can piece all of this together?

> Of course, you'd probably be banned from using a computer and the internet upon conviction, so there would probably be plenty of folks that might find themselves perfectly happy with that outcome too....

So tell us, oh wise one. Who will the FBI arrest first? Me or the guy behind the "peacemoonbeam" website? Should I contact my bookie and place some money on this?

Since you seem to be so fixated on who's going to be arrested and who isn't, maybe you can explain why the naked guy in this photo with his back to the camera wasn't arrested. It was at a pride parade. What was he proud of? That he was robbing a small child of his innocence?

[bernardgaynor.com.au]

P.S. If you get bored, Google who Jeffrey Marsh is.