Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Willamette vs. Shay -- Question
Author: Chas
Date: 06-18-2010 - 08:20

It is my understanding that Willamette did not have to pay Lima in regard to their locomotive. As Tom mentioned, many of the involved patents on the Shay had expired. Where patents were still in force, Willamette avoided using those items.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  My take on a "new" locomotive Tom Moungovan 06-17-2010 - 08:01
  Re: My take on a "new" locomotive Rails NW 06-17-2010 - 09:40
  Re: My take on a "new" locomotive Tom Moungovan 06-17-2010 - 10:56
  Re: My take on a "new" locomotive OTN 06-17-2010 - 10:22
  Willamette vs. Shay Roger 06-17-2010 - 12:36
  Recomended reading d 06-17-2010 - 13:04
  Re: Willamette vs. Shay Tom Moungovan 06-17-2010 - 14:07
  Re: Willamette vs. Shay -- Question George Andrews 06-17-2010 - 17:14
  Re: Willamette vs. Shay -- Question Tom Moungovan 06-17-2010 - 19:05
  Re: Willamette vs. Shay -- Question rickzampa 06-17-2010 - 19:19
  Re: Willamette vs. Shay -- Question Tom Moungovan 06-18-2010 - 07:42
  Re: Willamette vs. Shay -- Question Chas 06-18-2010 - 08:20
  Re: My take on a "new" locomotive NWexplorer 06-21-2010 - 14:45


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **  **     **  **         ******  
 **     **   **  **    **   **   **        **    ** 
 **     **    ****      ** **    **        **       
 ********      **        ***     **        **       
 **            **       ** **    **        **       
 **            **      **   **   **        **    ** 
 **            **     **     **  ********   ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com