Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: California's Full Crew law...1948?
Author: SLOCONDR
Date: 02-09-2011 - 07:45

I can tell you it was on the 1964 CA. ballot. This would have been the "feather bedding" issue with the position of the fireman. Then in the early 80's came the brakeman reduction, but that was an agreement provision between the carriers and the UTU.

V

SLOOCNDR

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  California's Full Crew law...1948? Frederick Pasre 02-09-2011 - 06:27
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? SLOCONDR 02-09-2011 - 07:45
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? Chas 02-09-2011 - 08:09
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? OPRRMS 02-09-2011 - 18:24
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? Frederick Pasre 02-09-2011 - 18:35
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? T Judah 02-11-2011 - 10:41
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? Dr Zarkoff 02-12-2011 - 11:22
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? OPRRMS 02-15-2011 - 18:58
  Re: California's Full Crew law...1948? George Andrews 02-16-2011 - 07:30
  Re: Fireman/etc. Severe Duty 02-16-2011 - 22:28
  Re: Fireman/etc. Dr Zarkoff 02-17-2011 - 10:46


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **    **   ******   **    **  **     ** 
 ***   **  ***   **  **    **  **   **   **     ** 
 ****  **  ****  **  **        **  **    **     ** 
 ** ** **  ** ** **  **        *****     **     ** 
 **  ****  **  ****  **        **  **    **     ** 
 **   ***  **   ***  **    **  **   **   **     ** 
 **    **  **    **   ******   **    **   *******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com