Drew Jacksich Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A few years back, my opthomologist told me that my
> prescription for my glasses did not need to be
> replaced. In fact it, it had not changed in
> several years to which he commented "...that is
> quite remarkable for a man your age." My age? He
> is older than I am!
>
> To day I got a note from one of the poobahs at
> railpictures.net telling that, no matter what I
> saw in the photo, it was underexposed. It was
> underexposed because the histogram said it was.
> Yeah right. First what the hell is a histogram?
> Sounds like something my wife had several years
> ago. Do I need a histogram when ever I look at
> photo to tell me it is under or over exposed? For
> some funny reason, my eyes still tell me that. My
> eyes tell what I like and don't like. Don't need
> no stinking histogram. (apologies to Alfonso
> Bedoya)

Nope, you don't need no histogram, not at all.

What you need to do is get your head out of your arrogant bung hole.

Remember Vanishing Vistas? You don't come close to meeting their quality.