Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive
Author: Bruce Kelly
Date: 07-29-2012 - 16:58

How much trouble could Jim get into by dangling high above the railroad in a tree? Does UP property include "air rights" above the right of way? Then again, there was that one incident where he apparently set up a ladder very close to the track on a certain eastern WA short line and caused considerable anxiety for the passing crew.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Passer 07-29-2012 - 10:50
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Tom Moungovan 07-29-2012 - 12:21
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive smitty195 07-29-2012 - 12:53
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Tom Moungovan 07-29-2012 - 14:42
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Jim Speaker 07-29-2012 - 16:39
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive smitty195 07-29-2012 - 16:53
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Bruce Kelly 07-29-2012 - 16:58
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Jim Speaker 07-29-2012 - 17:50
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Bozo Texino 08-01-2012 - 19:54
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive smitty195 08-01-2012 - 22:28
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive The REAL Jim Speaker 07-29-2012 - 19:35
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Do Tell 07-29-2012 - 22:14
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive OldPoleBurner 07-29-2012 - 22:24
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive Hutch 7.62 07-29-2012 - 23:13
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive short line guy 07-30-2012 - 06:10
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive SP Fan 07-30-2012 - 08:07
  Re: Foaming adventures can get a whole lot more expensive smitty195 07-30-2012 - 15:13
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. KRK 07-30-2012 - 16:14
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) ..& CA PC 369 G(a) KRK 07-30-2012 - 16:23
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. smitty195 07-30-2012 - 18:54
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. Ken Shattock (KRK) 07-31-2012 - 06:28
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. If I Was a Lawyer 07-31-2012 - 08:33
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. OPRRMS 07-31-2012 - 08:57
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. smitty195 07-31-2012 - 09:19
  Re: CA PC 369 (i) .. Short Line Guy 08-01-2012 - 08:29


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******    *******   **    **        **  **     ** 
 **    **  **     **  ***   **        **  **     ** 
 **        **     **  ****  **        **  **     ** 
 **         ********  ** ** **        **  ********* 
 **               **  **  ****  **    **  **     ** 
 **    **  **     **  **   ***  **    **  **     ** 
  ******    *******   **    **   ******   **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com