Read the Exhibit emails. You will see both pro and con as well as some major BS from both sides.

The question over the court delaying the election is with one individual who could not get his statements in for publication by the filing deadline date. And now he wants the rules to change for him. When the museum would not change the rules for him, the court was brought in to delay the election and review the issue. There is a procedure for a candidate to have their platform sent to all voting members prior to balot. This candidate chose not to follow that set procedure. Why has not been addressed yet. They are asking for FRRS to change or ignore polocy and are also going after costs/damages for their trouble as well. But in his defense, we have still not seen all of the details of his platform.

Again, read the exhibit emails in this Doc presented on the above web page:

"Supporting Declaration of Attorney Keith Gillette Verified Petiton
for Writ of Mandate filed 30MAR2015"

There are other issues between the candidates and FRRS not mentioned on their web page but shown in the exhibits.

I am sure now that this web page has finally been partially populated, we will be hearing more from the 3 new candidates and FRRS. There are always issues and room for improvement. We will hear more on this soon. Lets not jump to conclusions as not all presented is 100% the gospel truth. Emotions too often way in heavilly.