Re: ACE to San Francisco?
Author: david vartanoff
Date: 09-01-2016 - 21:42

To SFO, sure, but into San Francisco, not a good plan. Trains to Transbay will be electrified--no diesel fumes in the tunnels. So, either ACE trains would have to change engines, terminate short of the tunnel, buy dual mode power--a huge waste as in either mode one is dragging the hardware for the other. Having ACE trains terminate at Millbrae OTOH would give riders two different transfer options to SF, while there is space there for layup.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  ACE to San Francisco? Joint 09-01-2016 - 16:14
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? A.S.C. 09-01-2016 - 17:21
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? david vartanoff 09-01-2016 - 21:42
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Joint 09-01-2016 - 23:20
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Fred 09-02-2016 - 00:15
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Transportation Planner 09-02-2016 - 06:14
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Analysis or Speculation? BOB2 09-02-2016 - 07:35
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Analysis or Speculation? mook 09-02-2016 - 11:25
  Re: ACE on Westside Line? Jon 09-02-2016 - 21:06
  Re: ACE on Westside Line? An Observer 09-03-2016 - 09:55
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Clem 09-03-2016 - 11:28
  Re: ACE to San Francisco? Joint 09-03-2016 - 16:31


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  ********  **     **        **  **     ** 
  **   **      **     ***   ***        **  **     ** 
   ** **       **     **** ****        **  **     ** 
    ***        **     ** *** **        **  **     ** 
   ** **       **     **     **  **    **  **     ** 
  **   **      **     **     **  **    **  **     ** 
 **     **     **     **     **   ******    *******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com