 |
Re: And another Valley find from the time of the dinosaurs on Youtube
Author: That Bus Guy
Date: 01-20-2020 - 19:42
Keith Ode Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That Bus Guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In your response to theconductor, you asked
> "What
> > sexist posts?" and then said "Name one."
> >
> > Your disparagement of working women in general
> and
> > generalization about them not working as
> > efficiently as their male counterparts in the
> > first boldfaced text is totally sexist.
>
> Just because you don't like to hear something
> negative about women doesn't make it sexist.
What I like or dislike is irrelevant. I call it like it is you. Your disparagement of women is sexist.
Men
> work longer hours, take ALL of the responsibility
> at whatever job they share with women. The wage
> gap has been debunked over and over by economists.
> Women take more time off, cost more in company
> healthcare and don't do the dangerous, necessary
> work that men do.
I work for a mass transit system which employs many female bus drivers. They face the same hazards at work as the dude bus drivers. The system for which they work is not unique that way. Why don't you go San Francisco some day, board a MUNI bus being driven by a woman and see for yourself. Just don't tell her the same bile you posted above.
If women are truly equal to
> men, then they don't need kiss-ass excuse making
> men like you propping them up.
You really have a problem with reading comprehension. My reply did not have any excuses, nor was I propping anyone up.
I know you think
> you're being a good boy by sticking up for those
> poor, misrepresented women, but you're part of the
> problem and an embarrassment.
I'm only an embarrassment to you and the incompetents who think like you.
>
> > There are plenty of women in my office, none of
> > whom fit your disparaging description. Yes, a
> > number of years ago, there was a female
> colleague
> > with whom I had lunch who lamented the
> difficulty
> > of dating. However, she was slender and highly
> > competent at her job (so much so that I sent a
> > note to her supervisor complementing her on how
> > she handled a difficult situation and I wrote a
> > letter of recommendation when she left).
>
> Nobody cares about anecdotal evidence. There's
> always exceptions to the rule, but that doesn't
> negate said rule. Hanlon's Razor.
Correction: YOU don't care about my anecdotal evidence.
However, my experiences have been duplicated elsewhere in my work as well as by my friends and colleagues.
-------------------------------------------------------
> That Bus Guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In your response to theconductor, you asked
> "What
> > sexist posts?" and then said "Name one."
> >
> > Your disparagement of working women in general
> and
> > generalization about them not working as
> > efficiently as their male counterparts in the
> > first boldfaced text is totally sexist.
>
> Just because you don't like to hear something
> negative about women doesn't make it sexist.
What I like or dislike is irrelevant. I call it like it is you. Your disparagement of women is sexist.
Men
> work longer hours, take ALL of the responsibility
> at whatever job they share with women. The wage
> gap has been debunked over and over by economists.
> Women take more time off, cost more in company
> healthcare and don't do the dangerous, necessary
> work that men do.
I work for a mass transit system which employs many female bus drivers. They face the same hazards at work as the dude bus drivers. The system for which they work is not unique that way. Why don't you go San Francisco some day, board a MUNI bus being driven by a woman and see for yourself. Just don't tell her the same bile you posted above.
If women are truly equal to
> men, then they don't need kiss-ass excuse making
> men like you propping them up.
You really have a problem with reading comprehension. My reply did not have any excuses, nor was I propping anyone up.
I know you think
> you're being a good boy by sticking up for those
> poor, misrepresented women, but you're part of the
> problem and an embarrassment.
I'm only an embarrassment to you and the incompetents who think like you.
>
> > There are plenty of women in my office, none of
> > whom fit your disparaging description. Yes, a
> > number of years ago, there was a female
> colleague
> > with whom I had lunch who lamented the
> difficulty
> > of dating. However, she was slender and highly
> > competent at her job (so much so that I sent a
> > note to her supervisor complementing her on how
> > she handled a difficult situation and I wrote a
> > letter of recommendation when she left).
>
> Nobody cares about anecdotal evidence. There's
> always exceptions to the rule, but that doesn't
> negate said rule. Hanlon's Razor.
Correction: YOU don't care about my anecdotal evidence.
However, my experiences have been duplicated elsewhere in my work as well as by my friends and colleagues.
