Coal is coal, right? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If the City of Richmond is looking to force the
> closure of the Levin Terminal just because the
> terminal loads foreign ships of coal for use
> elsewhere, then why isn't there any ruckus raised
> over the use of coal in the production of cement?

For clarity, the facility handles various types of inbound and outbound bulk commodities on a contract basis not just coal, and the city council's resolution won't force its closure. It would only prevent coal from being handled there.