Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP
Author: Jon
Date: 01-05-2009 - 08:32

SP/UP has used flangers for decades on the lines through the Cascades and over the Sierra Nevada.

For the most part, neighboring WP/UP on the Feather River Route hasn't had the need to run flangers over that line due in-part to lower elevations, but the Highline, today's BNSF Gateway Sub, can also receive some pretty deep snow especially through the Westwood, Almanor, and Lodgepole areas. Usually just a spreader or plow has been used, except for the early '90's when UP was forced into using their rotary on the ex-WP lines. As far as I know, flangers have never been used on the the ex-WP lines.

Do any of you MoW types have an answer as to why there doesn't seem to be a need to use flangers on the ex-WP Highline, today's Gateway Sub? Almost always the snow is the same "Cascade Cement" consistency that is found throughout the Cascades and over the Sierra Nevada.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP Jon 01-05-2009 - 08:32
  Re: Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP hepkema 01-05-2009 - 12:53
  Re: Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP Stevo del Applegato 01-05-2009 - 13:09
  Re: Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP M. Harris 01-05-2009 - 19:55
  Re: Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP trainjunkie 01-05-2009 - 21:40
  Re: Flangers - WP/UP vs. SP/UP SP5103 01-05-2009 - 22:07


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **        **  **     **  ********   *******  
  **   **         **  **     **  **        **     ** 
   ** **          **  **     **  **               ** 
    ***           **  **     **  ******     *******  
   ** **    **    **  **     **  **               ** 
  **   **   **    **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 **     **   ******    *******   **         *******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com