Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Safety is of the first importance.... Or maybe not....?
Author: John
Date: 09-13-2023 - 20:13

If safety is of the first importance why were the RR's allowed to layoff one third of the workforce and expect one third fewer employees to safely preform the same amount of work? Why were train lengths increased by one third? The FRA just announced a high percentage of Union Pacific's freight cars and locomotives defective. Not enough employees to safely repair the cars and engines. A lower operating ratio is of the first importance. Safety takes a second. Not by words but by actions.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Safety is of the first importance.... Or maybe not....? BOB2 09-12-2023 - 08:04
  Re: Safety is of the first importance.... Or maybe not....? Just Sayin'... 09-12-2023 - 18:17
  Re: Safety is of the first importance.... Or maybe not....? Safety Officer 09-13-2023 - 16:11
  Re: Safety is of the first importance.... Or maybe not....? John 09-13-2023 - 20:13


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******   ********  **     **  **     **  **    ** 
 **    **  **         **   **    **   **    **  **  
 **        **          ** **      ** **      ****   
 **        ******       ***        ***        **    
 **        **          ** **      ** **       **    
 **    **  **         **   **    **   **      **    
  ******   **        **     **  **     **     **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com