 |
Re: Capital Punishment for trespassing & tagging?!? Really???
Author: Dragoman
Date: 05-18-2011 - 15:20
Juppo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dragoman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So, Juppo and Anthony G. and Mike Swanson --
> >
> > We all agree that trespassing on any RR ROW is
> not
> > only stupid and inherently dangerous, but it is
> > (rightfully) illegal. Tagging is also illegal,
> > and should be. I would certainly share the
> > sentiment apparently underlying many of these
> > comments, that taggers show pitifully little
> > respect for others, for others' property, and
> > anti-tagging enforcement should be stepped up
> > (probably including penalties that exceed the
> > current slap-on-the-wrist).
> >
> > But your comments seem to go on to imply that
> > tagging and/or trespassing violations deserve
> > capital punishment. Not only that, but
> > prepetrators should have this sentence be
> enforced
> > immediately and directly by the agent of the
> > property owner, who can act as judge and jury.
>
> Are you trying to be stupid? No one here or
> anywhere else that I've heard said that someone
> should be executed by the state or anyone else for
> graffiti. Please show me where that was said.
When you say that his death “was well deserved” (as you did in your first post) or “he does deserve to die” (as you did in your last post), because of what he has done, then that is exactly what you are saying.
> Do you even know what capital punishment is?
It is “the sentence of death upon a person … as a punishment for an offence” (Wikipedia) – exactly what you are saying when you say he deserved to die because of the bad act he committed. Are you really so ignorant that this has to be explained to you?
> What I and others were saying is that he does deserve to
> die due to his own stupid act and that he deserves
> no sympathy.
I think everyone deserves who is killed some sympathy, and his loved ones deserve some compassion.
> If someone runs out onto a freeway and gets hit by
> a car and dies, it isn't capital punishment and no
> one would be feeling sorry for this person. Are
> you really so ignorant that this has to be
> explained to you?
>
> He was in a subway, vandalizing other people's
> property and was hit by a train. 100% his fault.
> Call it creative suicide.
Even those who commit suicide – and their loved ones – deserve some sympathy and compassion.
> Now please, get your
> head out of your ass and don't vote.
Thank you so much for that kind piece of advice.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dragoman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So, Juppo and Anthony G. and Mike Swanson --
> >
> > We all agree that trespassing on any RR ROW is
> not
> > only stupid and inherently dangerous, but it is
> > (rightfully) illegal. Tagging is also illegal,
> > and should be. I would certainly share the
> > sentiment apparently underlying many of these
> > comments, that taggers show pitifully little
> > respect for others, for others' property, and
> > anti-tagging enforcement should be stepped up
> > (probably including penalties that exceed the
> > current slap-on-the-wrist).
> >
> > But your comments seem to go on to imply that
> > tagging and/or trespassing violations deserve
> > capital punishment. Not only that, but
> > prepetrators should have this sentence be
> enforced
> > immediately and directly by the agent of the
> > property owner, who can act as judge and jury.
>
> Are you trying to be stupid? No one here or
> anywhere else that I've heard said that someone
> should be executed by the state or anyone else for
> graffiti. Please show me where that was said.
When you say that his death “was well deserved” (as you did in your first post) or “he does deserve to die” (as you did in your last post), because of what he has done, then that is exactly what you are saying.
> Do you even know what capital punishment is?
It is “the sentence of death upon a person … as a punishment for an offence” (Wikipedia) – exactly what you are saying when you say he deserved to die because of the bad act he committed. Are you really so ignorant that this has to be explained to you?
> What I and others were saying is that he does deserve to
> die due to his own stupid act and that he deserves
> no sympathy.
I think everyone deserves who is killed some sympathy, and his loved ones deserve some compassion.
> If someone runs out onto a freeway and gets hit by
> a car and dies, it isn't capital punishment and no
> one would be feeling sorry for this person. Are
> you really so ignorant that this has to be
> explained to you?
>
> He was in a subway, vandalizing other people's
> property and was hit by a train. 100% his fault.
> Call it creative suicide.
Even those who commit suicide – and their loved ones – deserve some sympathy and compassion.
> Now please, get your
> head out of your ass and don't vote.
Thank you so much for that kind piece of advice.
