Re: Sacramento Northern's Lisbon Trestle
Author: Hutch 7.62
Date: 07-05-2012 - 22:42
fkrock Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Technically the builders of the waterway would
> have been requiured to build a multi-million
> dollar railroad bridge. However it was much
> cheaper to arrange for WP, owner of SN, to get
> trackage rights on SP.
>
> The line that was abandoned had little future
> value to WP. Industrial defelopment was unlikely.
> The railroad was paying property tax on the line.
>
> WP wanted to maintain access to the future deep
> water port on the Sacramento River that was part
> of the Solano County master plan. Access to the
> former SN line from SP at Canon provided that.
>
> Today most of the SN right of way from Canon all
> the way to the river belongs to the Western
> Railway Museum.
Thanks that's great info. I have personally wonder why the SN did not make the state pay for relocation much the way SP did during the Shasta dam project