Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
Author: George Andrews
Date: 12-15-2007 - 17:36
To Dave Smith;
Your comments regarding the " 2 Large Inland Barge systems " in the U.S. omits a very large & crucial system; one that ships hundreds of ISO containers every week. I am referring to the Alaska Barge system, run out of Seattle,WA. While technically not an Inland system, it is responsible for a large amount of product sent to the 49th State. But, like the Inland systems you noted, it also has an inbalance of loads North vs. empties South.
Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Ross Hall |
12-13-2007 - 17:48 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Dave Smith |
12-13-2007 - 19:35 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Ross Hall |
12-14-2007 - 17:35 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
George Andrews |
12-13-2007 - 19:39 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
S.L. Murray |
12-14-2007 - 09:50 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Bruce Kelly |
12-14-2007 - 10:26 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Bruce Kelly |
12-14-2007 - 13:08 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Ross Hall |
12-14-2007 - 17:43 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. There are also other issues.
|
Ross Hall |
12-14-2007 - 17:51 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Dave Smith |
12-14-2007 - 17:46 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Marc |
12-14-2007 - 20:50 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Dave Smith |
12-15-2007 - 11:45 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. |
George Andrews |
12-15-2007 - 17:36 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Marc |
12-15-2007 - 22:13 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
Dave Smith |
12-15-2007 - 23:50 |
Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
|
hummm... |
12-16-2007 - 14:45 |