Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada
Author: WAF
Date: 03-11-2014 - 16:56

pdxrailtransit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am just wondering if this "tampering of the
> evidence" was UP putting the crossing back in
> service as is probably required by law to be done
> as soon as possible.


A shifty lawyer will always ignore the law when it goes against his client



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  More BS from #5 incident in Nevada Hogger 03-11-2014 - 12:09
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada WAF 03-11-2014 - 13:36
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada pdxrailtransit 03-11-2014 - 15:54
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada E 03-11-2014 - 16:31
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada Drew Jacksich 03-11-2014 - 16:32
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada Fred 03-11-2014 - 16:50
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada Drew Jacksich 03-11-2014 - 17:06
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada WAF 03-11-2014 - 16:56
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada Deserthikenbike 03-11-2014 - 22:12
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada Scott Schiechl 03-12-2014 - 14:45
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada MP 97.7 03-13-2014 - 09:01
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada M. Harris 03-13-2014 - 10:34
  Re: More BS from #5 incident in Nevada WebDigger 03-13-2014 - 11:07


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **   *******   **     **  **    **  ******** 
       **  **     **  ***   ***  ***   **  **       
       **  **     **  **** ****  ****  **  **       
       **   ********  ** *** **  ** ** **  ******   
 **    **         **  **     **  **  ****  **       
 **    **  **     **  **     **  **   ***  **       
  ******    *******   **     **  **    **  ******** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com