Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor
Author: SP5103
Date: 07-26-2015 - 09:46

I think the traditional concept of the railroad yard, at least on a divisional or local level, has pretty much faded. In my lifetime, trains seem to have grown from around 50 cars / 5,000 tons / 3,500 feet to today's monsters at 110 cars / 15,000 tons and 7,000+ feet. It used to be must crew changes had a big enough yard to be able to yard several trains during a MOW window, holiday, waiting for rested crews or other interruptions. These yard tracks have disappeared for a variety of reasons: failure to maintain and upgrade, too short in today's world, property taxes or just due to stupidity. Most of today's trains are restricted to trying to fit wherever they can close to a terminal, hopefully without cutting any crossings or tying down a zillion handbrakes, or pissing off the neighbors with idling/restarting diesels.

Basic problem is this - all these college kid managers (no practicable on the ground experience) and bean counters were quick to point out how much labor could be eliminated by running DPU and monster trains, but did not take into account, admit to or were even aware of the need to make the other improvements needed to keep the railroad fluid.

Could you imagine most of today's railroaders trying to run trains in dark territory with retainers, train orders/timetables, flagging, no radios and all the while dodging multiple passenger and superior trains rarely delaying them? I know railroads are more efficient in today's world, but they are still missing the mark in safety and efficiency in my opinion.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  New track proposed for capitol corridor P.Kepler 07-24-2015 - 21:12
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-24-2015 - 21:43
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Coast Flyer 07-25-2015 - 08:28
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor mook 07-25-2015 - 10:05
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor george manley 07-25-2015 - 12:15
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor K.H. Hunt 07-25-2015 - 12:22
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor ron 07-26-2015 - 07:32
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor theconductor 07-25-2015 - 12:29
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor gweorge manley 07-25-2015 - 19:06
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor mook 07-25-2015 - 20:42
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-25-2015 - 23:21
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor ex-BN 07-26-2015 - 06:37
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-26-2015 - 20:11
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Old Oil Burner 07-28-2015 - 08:15
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor SP5103 07-26-2015 - 09:46
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-26-2015 - 20:15
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Transportation Planner 07-26-2015 - 07:43
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Transportation Planner 07-26-2015 - 07:56
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor mook 07-26-2015 - 08:52
  UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Bob 07-26-2015 - 09:31
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! SP5103 07-26-2015 - 09:59
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! theconductor 07-26-2015 - 10:14
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Jon 07-26-2015 - 10:27
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Old Oil Burner 07-28-2015 - 12:18
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Jim Farmer 07-29-2015 - 12:08
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor theconductor 07-26-2015 - 10:33
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Ronnie 07-26-2015 - 10:58


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **  **     **   *******   ******** 
 **     **  ***   **  **     **  **     **     **    
 **     **  ****  **  **     **  **     **     **    
 **     **  ** ** **  *********   ********     **    
 **     **  **  ****  **     **         **     **    
 **     **  **   ***  **     **  **     **     **    
 ********   **    **  **     **   *******      **    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com