Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track!
Author: SP5103
Date: 07-26-2015 - 09:59

And when UP melted down circa 2004/2005, part of the problem was that Roseville was blocking trains for more locations than they had bowl tracks even before considering tracks out of service for maintenance or being pulled by a trim job.

I've always wondered if the practice of assigning cars as empties enroute makes sense? It used to be that a major yard only had to dump the common empties onto a few tracks. As the locals or haulers were made up, they could just grab X number of boxes, flats, hoppers, etc. to fill their work orders. Now most particular cars have to be not only assigned to a certain local or roadswitch but are already assigned to a particular customer instead of conductor's choice. Add all the private leased cars, and I think railroads have actually made loose/single car traffic far more inefficient than it needs to be.

Oh well, all the railroads really want to move are unit trains and those don't need no stinkin yards, switch engines or crews to be switched.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  New track proposed for capitol corridor P.Kepler 07-24-2015 - 21:12
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-24-2015 - 21:43
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Coast Flyer 07-25-2015 - 08:28
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor mook 07-25-2015 - 10:05
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor george manley 07-25-2015 - 12:15
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor K.H. Hunt 07-25-2015 - 12:22
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor ron 07-26-2015 - 07:32
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor theconductor 07-25-2015 - 12:29
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor gweorge manley 07-25-2015 - 19:06
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor mook 07-25-2015 - 20:42
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-25-2015 - 23:21
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor ex-BN 07-26-2015 - 06:37
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-26-2015 - 20:11
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Old Oil Burner 07-28-2015 - 08:15
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor SP5103 07-26-2015 - 09:46
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Dr Zarkoff 07-26-2015 - 20:15
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Transportation Planner 07-26-2015 - 07:43
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Transportation Planner 07-26-2015 - 07:56
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor mook 07-26-2015 - 08:52
  UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Bob 07-26-2015 - 09:31
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! SP5103 07-26-2015 - 09:59
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! theconductor 07-26-2015 - 10:14
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Jon 07-26-2015 - 10:27
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Old Oil Burner 07-28-2015 - 12:18
  Re: UP: We don't need no stinkin' track! Jim Farmer 07-29-2015 - 12:08
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor theconductor 07-26-2015 - 10:33
  Re: New track proposed for capitol corridor Ronnie 07-26-2015 - 10:58


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  ********   ********  **     **  ******** 
 **     **  **     **  **        **     **  **    ** 
 **     **  **     **  **        **     **      **   
 **     **  **     **  ******    *********     **    
  **   **   **     **  **        **     **    **     
   ** **    **     **  **        **     **    **     
    ***     ********   ********  **     **    **     
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com