Re: Caltrain EMU's
Author: mook
Date: 10-21-2015 - 12:47

Are the SMART DMUs FRA-compliant in the old sense (solid boxes, no crush zones) or the new sense ("equivalent" FRA compliance using crush zones)? I'm pretty sure the eBARTs are the latter. Technically, a FRA waiver is needed to use the crush zone approach, which is really what Caltrain is asking for.

In a typical grade crossing accident the crush zone should not be a factor. Perhaps, if a heavily loaded truck is hit at speed it might come into play - if the truck is a substantial fraction of the mass of the rail vehicle. But ordinarily it will not, any more than an old-style FRA-compliant structure would be damaged. FRA compliance, however it's done, is oriented mainly at train-on-train collisions.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Caltrain EMU's J 10-20-2015 - 06:53
  Re: Caltrain EMU's Espee99 10-20-2015 - 16:34
  Re: Caltrain EMU's Max Wyss 10-21-2015 - 10:51
  Re: Caltrain EMU's mook 10-21-2015 - 12:47
  Re: Caltrain EMU's Peter 10-21-2015 - 16:11
  Re: Caltrain EMU's Max Wyss 10-21-2015 - 16:15
  Re: Caltrain EMU's Espee99 10-21-2015 - 17:56


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   ********  **     **  **    **  **      ** 
 **     **     **     **     **  ***   **  **  **  ** 
 **            **     **     **  ****  **  **  **  ** 
 ********      **     **     **  ** ** **  **  **  ** 
 **     **     **      **   **   **  ****  **  **  ** 
 **     **     **       ** **    **   ***  **  **  ** 
  *******      **        ***     **    **   ***  ***  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com