Re: AP's Future
Author: Not living in the past
Date: 02-03-2017 - 15:25

ex-BN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps this board could have a volunteer or two
> that moderates the board by quickly deleting posts
> that are off topic/mean spirited/nonsense/overly
> political. I'd suggest starting by blocking those
> IP addresses that have done so in the past. Fair?
> Not completely. But better than the massive
> dilution that often occurs here.
>
> Most of us don't want to hear this back and forth
> trash talking. Some political talk is part of
> railroading such as political supporters or
> enemies of Amtrak. That is fine but the rest can
> be tossed in the rubbish bin. Let's get back to
> railroading. Particularly the "Good old days" in
> my case. The recent discussion of early GEs
> selector switches was interesting to me in
> particular. I never ran one but was familiar with
> EMDs selector and transition levers.
>
> I was drawn to TrainOrders.com years ago because
> of my interest in timetable and train order
> operation. It hardly was so I left. I've always
> returned to AP since its highly accessible and
> covers western railroading where I've spent 40
> years drawing a RR paycheck.
>
> As a final suggestion I'd ask that posters don't
> assume readers live in your area and know the name
> of every siding and spur. Include the state if
> its not obvious and better yet use the pre-merger
> line if known. With all the mergers over the
> years saying UP in California or BNSF in
> Washington covers a lot of track. A recent post
> mentioned the Fallbridge sub on the former BN in
> WA. I'm more familiar with older divisions and
> subs by number but that changes too. A brief
> description would have helped me understand the
> post better and isn't that the point? After
> looking it up I realize it is the former SP&S line
> along the Columbia River in Washington. Basically
> Pasco to Portland. This was inserted into a
> thread on the former NP line in Washington between
> Pasco and Auburn (Seattle). Even though I know
> this area well I was not up on the latest
> subdivision names.

Given that a question came up about current train levels on the Stamped Sub, (former NP line over the cascades) issues on the Fallbridge sub had great relevance. (former SP&S line down the gorge). It wouldn't make a whole lot of sense to describe lines before 1970 when addressing a question about current operations.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  AP's Future Wondering 02-03-2017 - 12:59
  Re: AP's Future NeverTrump 02-03-2017 - 13:19
  Re: AP's Future Pdxrailtransit 02-03-2017 - 13:49
  Re: AP's Future NeverTrump is a dork 02-03-2017 - 21:08
  Re: AP's Future Never Hillary 02-06-2017 - 08:19
  Re: AP's Future NeverTrump 02-06-2017 - 10:14
  Re: AP's Future ex-BN 02-03-2017 - 14:07
  Re: AP's Future Dr Zarkoff 02-03-2017 - 14:30
  Re: AP's Future sp1269 02-03-2017 - 14:38
  Re: AP's Future -- sp1269 02-03-2017 - 19:16
  Re: AP's Future Censorship RYPN 02-03-2017 - 15:12
  Re: AP's Future Agent 99 02-03-2017 - 21:29
  Re: AP's Future Not living in the past 02-03-2017 - 15:25
  Re: AP's Future Not living in the past 02-03-2017 - 15:26
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Holly 02-03-2017 - 15:38
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Jim Speaker 02-03-2017 - 15:53
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Chuck 02-03-2017 - 16:10
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Steve Thompson 02-03-2017 - 16:17
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Jim Speaker 02-03-2017 - 16:32
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Tom Farence 02-03-2017 - 16:48
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. D.J. 02-03-2017 - 17:26
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Tommy J 02-03-2017 - 18:05
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Peter D. 02-04-2017 - 18:09
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Bozo Texino 02-03-2017 - 18:03
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. gandyman 02-03-2017 - 19:38
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Jim Speaker 02-03-2017 - 20:06
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Espee2472 02-03-2017 - 22:38
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is. Espee2472 02-03-2017 - 22:56
  Say Jim George 02-04-2017 - 11:42
  Re: AP's Future El Brujo 02-03-2017 - 23:41
  Re: AP's Future Espee2472 02-03-2017 - 23:47
  Re: AP's Future Political agendas 02-04-2017 - 07:54
  Re: AP's Future I Got It 02-04-2017 - 09:14
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is, ain't nothing broke..... BOB2 02-04-2017 - 10:36
  Re: AP's Future Leave as is, ain't nothing broke..... Nussel Snouts 02-04-2017 - 21:40
  Re: AP's Future Negin 02-04-2017 - 10:17
  Re: AP's Future Just Moderate 02-04-2017 - 10:46
  Re: AP's Future Bruce Kelly 02-04-2017 - 11:09
  Could just take a cue from Bambi Pdxrailtransit 02-04-2017 - 12:09
  Re: Could just take a cue from Bambi WebDigger 02-04-2017 - 13:17
  Re: Could just take a cue from Bambi Pdxrailtransit 02-04-2017 - 15:16
  Re: Could just take a cue from Bambi Fed up 02-06-2017 - 08:29
  Re: Could just take a cue from Bambi Dewey Defeats Truman 02-06-2017 - 11:09
  Re: Could just take a cue from Bambi Sumotuwe 02-06-2017 - 11:48
  Re: AP's Future Buckcarspecialist 02-05-2017 - 06:30
  Re: AP's Future David.Curlee 02-04-2017 - 13:34
  Well spoken David, thank you! Pdxrailtransit 02-04-2017 - 13:42
  Re: AP's Future M. Harris 02-04-2017 - 14:54
  Re: AP's Future Peter D. 02-04-2017 - 18:14
  Re: AP's Future Negin 02-04-2017 - 22:48
  Re: AP's Future J.K. Trowling 02-04-2017 - 19:29
  Re: AP's Future Negin 02-04-2017 - 22:45


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   *******   **     **   ******   **        
 **    **  **     **   **   **   **    **  **    **  
     **           **    ** **    **        **    **  
    **      *******      ***     **        **    **  
   **             **    ** **    **        ********* 
   **      **     **   **   **   **    **        **  
   **       *******   **     **   ******         **  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com