Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian
Author: S. L. Murray
Date: 02-05-2007 - 19:17

I don't have any information on this, but the whole idea of rebuilding the MILW Ellensburg to Lind line segment doesn't make any sense to me. Why would you choose a mountain grade over a basically water level route? Why rebuild a line when there is a perfectly fine line (the ex NP/WCRC) that was recently rehabbed? Even if there were capacity constraints at some point (such as the Columbia River bridge) it seems vastly cheaper to add capacity there than rebuild an entire line.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  CW Branch Aaron S. 02-03-2007 - 20:39
  Re: CW Branch K 02-04-2007 - 14:59
  Re: CW Branch Ross Hall 02-04-2007 - 17:14
  Re: CW Branch Bill Maltby 02-04-2007 - 18:02
  Re: CW Branch SDP45 02-04-2007 - 20:42
  NP-GN connection at Adrian Bruce Butler 02-05-2007 - 03:15
  Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian Ken Liesse 02-05-2007 - 17:34
  Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian S. L. Murray 02-05-2007 - 19:17
  Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian Ross Hall 02-06-2007 - 17:16
  Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian SDP45 02-06-2007 - 17:50
  Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian hepkema 02-07-2007 - 08:53
  Re: NP-GN connection at Adrian douglasm 02-07-2007 - 11:04


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **         *******    ******     *******  
    **     **        **     **  **    **   **     ** 
    **     **        **     **  **         **        
    **     **         ********  **   ****  ********  
    **     **               **  **    **   **     ** 
    **     **        **     **  **    **   **     ** 
    **     ********   *******    ******     *******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com