Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios
Author: Rich Hunn
Date: 09-27-2008 - 09:50

I do remember somewhere in the back of my mind that someone did order low geared F's, believe they
were F-3's as a matter of fact. Dick has a good point on the high ratio ring/pinion problem. The
ring gear was limited by case size and mounting so that if you wanted a high ratio it took a smaller pinion and when you could no longer machine a pinion small enough you had to cut the teeth
right into the motor output shaft. To reduce tooth loadings (force vs area) the fine spline or
83:20 (or so) was introduced which put more teeth in mesh to handle the load. Reduction is still\
a little over 4:1 just handled a bit different.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Locomotive Gear Ratios Jeff Johnson 09-25-2008 - 23:01
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios night rider 09-26-2008 - 01:16
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios GunnerV 09-26-2008 - 14:42
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios shortline sammie 09-26-2008 - 19:40
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios Rich Hunn 09-27-2008 - 09:50
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios George Andrews 09-28-2008 - 12:09
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios SP5103 09-29-2008 - 12:24
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios Dr Zarkoff 09-30-2008 - 12:08
  Re: Locomotive Gear Ratios Earl Williams 05-21-2009 - 15:56


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   ********  ********        **   ******  
 **     **  **        **              **  **    ** 
 **     **  **        **              **  **       
 **     **  ******    ******          **  **       
 **     **  **        **        **    **  **       
 **     **  **        **        **    **  **    ** 
 ********   ********  ********   ******    ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com