Re: Guaurdowhadever
Author: synonymouse
Date: 01-16-2009 - 19:31

Incompatible and idiosyncratic have been hallmarks of BART since its inception so it seems perfectly appropriate that they deploy 2 different fleets(I assume temporarily). Sort of an extrapolation of their early A and B type car folly.

As to BART's being out of its jurisdiction in Santa Clara I have to think it is question of the camel getting its nose in the tent.

Towns along the route demanding extra perks is a more complicated issue. BART trains are so noisy and their elevated structures are so ugly that I actually think that Berkeley did the right thing in paying extra for their subway. It has proven to be a wise investment. Not to mention the earthquake vulnerability of the elevated structures not anticipated in the early sixties. I know the light rail projects in LA are having problems with the public demanding more grade separation than there is money available. Perhaps if transit followed thru on their promise of incremental improvements the public would be more supportive. Apparently Sacramento light rail recently did built some overpasses, which it had promised as money became available. Kudos. SF Muni take note.

Sometimes exorbitant demands are simply an expression of outright opposition, as in the case of Novato.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  BART grabs commute rail money - SMART should worry synonymouse 01-15-2009 - 13:10
  Re: BART grabs commute rail money - SMART should worry crmeatball 01-15-2009 - 15:43
  Re: BART grabs commute rail money - SMART should worry david vartanoff 01-15-2009 - 19:05
  Re: BART grabs commute rail money - SMART should worry Drew Jacksich 01-15-2009 - 22:13
  Re: BART grabs commute rail money - SMART should worry Jay L. Tulock 01-16-2009 - 02:53
  Re: BART grabs commute rail money - SMART should worry The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-16-2009 - 08:21
  Guaurdowhadever Jason L. Tulock 01-16-2009 - 08:59
  Re: Guaurdowhadever Drew Jacksich 01-16-2009 - 09:50
  Re: Guaurdowhadever synonymouse 01-16-2009 - 10:45
  Re: Guaurdowhadever OldPoleBurner 01-16-2009 - 13:06
  Re: Guaurdowhadever Drew Jacksich 01-16-2009 - 13:28
  Re: Guaurdowhadever stash 01-17-2009 - 12:54
  Re: Guaurdowhadever merk 01-16-2009 - 18:20
  merk, you see clearly grasshopper Jay L. Tulock 01-16-2009 - 19:22
  Re: Guaurdowhadever synonymouse 01-16-2009 - 19:31
  Re: Guaurdowhadever TROLL Hunter 01-17-2009 - 15:22
  Re: Guaurdowhadever Jay L. Tulock 01-18-2009 - 09:07
  Re: Guaurdowhadever synonymouse 01-18-2009 - 11:27
  Re: Guaurdowhadever Drew Jacksich 01-18-2009 - 18:22
  Re: Guaurdowhadever synonymouse 01-18-2009 - 20:38
  Re: Guaurdowhadever Jeff Spicoli 01-19-2009 - 07:44
  Re: Guaurdowhadever Policespeeder 01-29-2009 - 04:59
  Re: Guaurdowhadever The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-20-2009 - 10:00
  Re: Don't Whine - Just Fix IT OldPoleburner 01-20-2009 - 15:05
  Re: Don't Whine - Just Fix IT synonymouse 01-20-2009 - 22:07


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **   ******    *******   **     ** 
 **        **     **  **    **  **     **  **     ** 
 **        **     **  **        **         **     ** 
 ******    **     **  **        ********   **     ** 
 **        **     **  **        **     **   **   **  
 **        **     **  **    **  **     **    ** **   
 ********   *******    ******    *******      ***    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com