 |
Why the Double Standard?
Author: Trigger
Date: 10-24-2021 - 17:02
Tinfoil Hat Monster Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > a lot of clowns post excrement here with fraudulent intent,
> Correct, Triggy Baby, you do post doo-doo with the intent of defrauding us from our RR related discussions.
Alright, let's make yet another rotation on this goofy-ass merry-go-round. I've explained all this before. Maybe you'll "get it" THIS time:
(1.) Whether my discussion threads are, or are not, "on topic" (i.e., related to trains), you should know, by now, that there have been a whole lot of other participants here at Altamont Press who have initiated "off topic" discussion threads. Why do you have a "hard on" for me and simultaneously give them a free pass? Why the double standard? Is it because I discuss politics and you don't have the will power to scroll past my postings and find a discussion dealing with trains? Do you not have the will power to refrain from making responding posts? I think we know the answer to THAT one!
(2.) That fact of the matter is I DO post contributions that are related to trains and railroading. Did you not see the satirical piece about Pete Booty-Judge ramming a freight train into a cargo ship between his chest feeding sessions? Or did you think it was a non-satirical piece? It was about trains. Why did it not meet your stringent standards for acceptance?
[babylonbee.com]
Did you not see the item I posted about the shootout on AMTK # 2 in Tucson and how we wouldn't have that problem if we weren't such a mamby-pamby, bleeding heart liberal society and actually kept career criminals locked up instead of repeatedly releasing them so they can ride Amtrak trains and engage in shootouts with cops?
[tucson.com]
Did you not see the piece I posted about how oppressed minorities should practice "safety first" as they loot freight trains? This, as they're making off with merchandise that bleeding heart liberals feel they're entitled to.
[youtu.be]
Did these pieces not meet your criteria for being closely associated enough with trains and railroading?
And if not, why not?
[sp.rmbl.ws]
-------------------------------------------------------
> > a lot of clowns post excrement here with fraudulent intent,
> Correct, Triggy Baby, you do post doo-doo with the intent of defrauding us from our RR related discussions.
Alright, let's make yet another rotation on this goofy-ass merry-go-round. I've explained all this before. Maybe you'll "get it" THIS time:
(1.) Whether my discussion threads are, or are not, "on topic" (i.e., related to trains), you should know, by now, that there have been a whole lot of other participants here at Altamont Press who have initiated "off topic" discussion threads. Why do you have a "hard on" for me and simultaneously give them a free pass? Why the double standard? Is it because I discuss politics and you don't have the will power to scroll past my postings and find a discussion dealing with trains? Do you not have the will power to refrain from making responding posts? I think we know the answer to THAT one!
(2.) That fact of the matter is I DO post contributions that are related to trains and railroading. Did you not see the satirical piece about Pete Booty-Judge ramming a freight train into a cargo ship between his chest feeding sessions? Or did you think it was a non-satirical piece? It was about trains. Why did it not meet your stringent standards for acceptance?
[babylonbee.com]
Did you not see the item I posted about the shootout on AMTK # 2 in Tucson and how we wouldn't have that problem if we weren't such a mamby-pamby, bleeding heart liberal society and actually kept career criminals locked up instead of repeatedly releasing them so they can ride Amtrak trains and engage in shootouts with cops?
[tucson.com]
Did you not see the piece I posted about how oppressed minorities should practice "safety first" as they loot freight trains? This, as they're making off with merchandise that bleeding heart liberals feel they're entitled to.
[youtu.be]
Did these pieces not meet your criteria for being closely associated enough with trains and railroading?
And if not, why not?
[sp.rmbl.ws]
