 |
Re: Why the Double Standard?
Author: Tom
Date: 10-24-2021 - 17:41
Trigger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tinfoil Hat Monster Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > a lot of clowns post excrement here with
> fraudulent intent,
>
> > Correct, Triggy Baby, you do post doo-doo with
> the intent of defrauding us from our RR related
> discussions.
>
> Alright, let's make yet another rotation on this
> goofy-ass merry-go-round. I've explained all this
> before. Maybe you'll "get it" THIS time:
>
> (1.) Whether my discussion threads are, or are
> not, "on topic" (i.e., related to trains), you
> should know, by now, that there have been a whole
> lot of other participants here at Altamont Press
> who have initiated "off topic" discussion threads.
> Why do you have a "hard on" for me and
> simultaneously give them a free pass? Why the
> double standard? Is it because I discuss politics
> and you don't have the will power to scroll past
> my postings and find a discussion dealing with
> trains? Do you not have the will power to refrain
> from making responding posts? I think we know the
> answer to THAT one!
>
> (2.) That fact of the matter is I DO post
> contributions that are related to trains and
> railroading. Did you not see the satirical piece
> about Pete Booty-Judge ramming a freight train
> into a cargo ship between his chest feeding
> sessions? Or did you think it was a non-satirical
> piece? It was about trains. Why did it not meet
> your stringent standards for acceptance?
>
> [babylonbee.com]
> ieg-just-crashed-a-train-into-a-cargo-ship/
>
> Did you not see the item I posted about the
> shootout on AMTK # 2 in Tucson and how we wouldn't
> have that problem if we weren't such a
> mamby-pamby, bleeding heart liberal society and
> actually kept career criminals locked up instead
> of repeatedly releasing them so they can ride
> Amtrak trains and engage in shootouts with cops?
>
>
> [tucson.com]
> -train-shooting-faced-charges-in-california/articl
> e_74cb3450-ea6c-52d4-b836-dc1a1aca5427.html
>
> Did you not see the piece I posted about how
> oppressed minorities should practice "safety
> first" as they loot freight trains? This, as
> they're making off with merchandise that bleeding
> heart liberals feel they're entitled to.
>
> [youtu.be]
>
> Did these pieces not meet your criteria for being
> closely associated enough with trains and
> railroading?
>
> And if not, why not?
>
> [sp.rmbl.ws]
Triggy the Trumpster Dumpster Piggy:
Stop with the BS commentary and focus on railroads and related subjects. Moreover, this isn’t the forum to show people that you’re intelligent, or not… if you don’t understand how easy and crystal clear this is, you likely should find a new hobby, maybe breeding and kissing goldfish. Whatever the hobby is, buzz off, find another medium to express your non-railroad views and political degenerate trash.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tinfoil Hat Monster Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > a lot of clowns post excrement here with
> fraudulent intent,
>
> > Correct, Triggy Baby, you do post doo-doo with
> the intent of defrauding us from our RR related
> discussions.
>
> Alright, let's make yet another rotation on this
> goofy-ass merry-go-round. I've explained all this
> before. Maybe you'll "get it" THIS time:
>
> (1.) Whether my discussion threads are, or are
> not, "on topic" (i.e., related to trains), you
> should know, by now, that there have been a whole
> lot of other participants here at Altamont Press
> who have initiated "off topic" discussion threads.
> Why do you have a "hard on" for me and
> simultaneously give them a free pass? Why the
> double standard? Is it because I discuss politics
> and you don't have the will power to scroll past
> my postings and find a discussion dealing with
> trains? Do you not have the will power to refrain
> from making responding posts? I think we know the
> answer to THAT one!
>
> (2.) That fact of the matter is I DO post
> contributions that are related to trains and
> railroading. Did you not see the satirical piece
> about Pete Booty-Judge ramming a freight train
> into a cargo ship between his chest feeding
> sessions? Or did you think it was a non-satirical
> piece? It was about trains. Why did it not meet
> your stringent standards for acceptance?
>
> [babylonbee.com]
> ieg-just-crashed-a-train-into-a-cargo-ship/
>
> Did you not see the item I posted about the
> shootout on AMTK # 2 in Tucson and how we wouldn't
> have that problem if we weren't such a
> mamby-pamby, bleeding heart liberal society and
> actually kept career criminals locked up instead
> of repeatedly releasing them so they can ride
> Amtrak trains and engage in shootouts with cops?
>
>
> [tucson.com]
> -train-shooting-faced-charges-in-california/articl
> e_74cb3450-ea6c-52d4-b836-dc1a1aca5427.html
>
> Did you not see the piece I posted about how
> oppressed minorities should practice "safety
> first" as they loot freight trains? This, as
> they're making off with merchandise that bleeding
> heart liberals feel they're entitled to.
>
> [youtu.be]
>
> Did these pieces not meet your criteria for being
> closely associated enough with trains and
> railroading?
>
> And if not, why not?
>
> [sp.rmbl.ws]
Triggy the Trumpster Dumpster Piggy:
Stop with the BS commentary and focus on railroads and related subjects. Moreover, this isn’t the forum to show people that you’re intelligent, or not… if you don’t understand how easy and crystal clear this is, you likely should find a new hobby, maybe breeding and kissing goldfish. Whatever the hobby is, buzz off, find another medium to express your non-railroad views and political degenerate trash.
