 |
Re: Why the Double Standard?
Author: Tim
Date: 10-24-2021 - 17:50
Trigger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tinfoil Hat Monster Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > a lot of clowns post excrement here with
> fraudulent intent,
>
> > Correct, Triggy Baby, you do post doo-doo with
> the intent of defrauding us from our RR related
> discussions.
>
> Alright, let's make yet another rotation on this
> goofy-ass merry-go-round. I've explained all this
> before. Maybe you'll "get it" THIS time:
>
> (1.) Whether my discussion threads are, or are
> not, "on topic" (i.e., related to trains), you
> should know, by now, that there have been a whole
> lot of other participants here at Altamont Press
> who have initiated "off topic" discussion threads.
> Why do you have a "hard on" for me and
> simultaneously give them a free pass? Why the
> double standard? Is it because I discuss politics
> and you don't have the will power to scroll past
> my postings and find a discussion dealing with
> trains? Do you not have the will power to refrain
> from making responding posts? I think we know the
> answer to THAT one!
>
> (2.) That fact of the matter is I DO post
> contributions that are related to trains and
> railroading. Did you not see the satirical piece
> about Pete Booty-Judge ramming a freight train
> into a cargo ship between his chest feeding
> sessions? Or did you think it was a non-satirical
> piece? It was about trains. Why did it not meet
> your stringent standards for acceptance?
>
> [babylonbee.com]
> ieg-just-crashed-a-train-into-a-cargo-ship/
>
> Did you not see the item I posted about the
> shootout on AMTK # 2 in Tucson and how we wouldn't
> have that problem if we weren't such a
> mamby-pamby, bleeding heart liberal society and
> actually kept career criminals locked up instead
> of repeatedly releasing them so they can ride
> Amtrak trains and engage in shootouts with cops?
>
>
> [tucson.com]
> -train-shooting-faced-charges-in-california/articl
> e_74cb3450-ea6c-52d4-b836-dc1a1aca5427.html
>
> Did you not see the piece I posted about how
> oppressed minorities should practice "safety
> first" as they loot freight trains? This, as
> they're making off with merchandise that bleeding
> heart liberals feel they're entitled to.
>
> [youtu.be]
>
> Did these pieces not meet your criteria for being
> closely associated enough with trains and
> railroading?
>
> And if not, why not?
>
> [sp.rmbl.ws]
Ooooo. My little Triggy said "hard on!"
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tinfoil Hat Monster Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > a lot of clowns post excrement here with
> fraudulent intent,
>
> > Correct, Triggy Baby, you do post doo-doo with
> the intent of defrauding us from our RR related
> discussions.
>
> Alright, let's make yet another rotation on this
> goofy-ass merry-go-round. I've explained all this
> before. Maybe you'll "get it" THIS time:
>
> (1.) Whether my discussion threads are, or are
> not, "on topic" (i.e., related to trains), you
> should know, by now, that there have been a whole
> lot of other participants here at Altamont Press
> who have initiated "off topic" discussion threads.
> Why do you have a "hard on" for me and
> simultaneously give them a free pass? Why the
> double standard? Is it because I discuss politics
> and you don't have the will power to scroll past
> my postings and find a discussion dealing with
> trains? Do you not have the will power to refrain
> from making responding posts? I think we know the
> answer to THAT one!
>
> (2.) That fact of the matter is I DO post
> contributions that are related to trains and
> railroading. Did you not see the satirical piece
> about Pete Booty-Judge ramming a freight train
> into a cargo ship between his chest feeding
> sessions? Or did you think it was a non-satirical
> piece? It was about trains. Why did it not meet
> your stringent standards for acceptance?
>
> [babylonbee.com]
> ieg-just-crashed-a-train-into-a-cargo-ship/
>
> Did you not see the item I posted about the
> shootout on AMTK # 2 in Tucson and how we wouldn't
> have that problem if we weren't such a
> mamby-pamby, bleeding heart liberal society and
> actually kept career criminals locked up instead
> of repeatedly releasing them so they can ride
> Amtrak trains and engage in shootouts with cops?
>
>
> [tucson.com]
> -train-shooting-faced-charges-in-california/articl
> e_74cb3450-ea6c-52d4-b836-dc1a1aca5427.html
>
> Did you not see the piece I posted about how
> oppressed minorities should practice "safety
> first" as they loot freight trains? This, as
> they're making off with merchandise that bleeding
> heart liberals feel they're entitled to.
>
> [youtu.be]
>
> Did these pieces not meet your criteria for being
> closely associated enough with trains and
> railroading?
>
> And if not, why not?
>
> [sp.rmbl.ws]
Ooooo. My little Triggy said "hard on!"
