Re: Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose
Author: name
Date: 10-09-2023 - 06:40

david vartanoff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If San Jose wants the line built, they need to go
> for a shallow cut and cover setup. Platforms to
> the two sides of the tracks in the center. Short
> stairs down (and elevators/escalators) fare gates
> on the platforms, no mezzanine. Way cheaper,
> faster, fewer materials, AND more convenient for
> passengers. No need for Gold/Platinum plated
> project.


I wonder why that cut and cover option was rejected. I haven’t read about this BART extension in a while.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose c 10-08-2023 - 09:57
  the-cost-of-the-vtas-san-jose-bart-extension-is-spiraling-out-of-control-2 Le Boring Real Title 10-08-2023 - 12:00
  Re: Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose david vartanoff 10-08-2023 - 23:32
  Re: Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose name 10-09-2023 - 06:40
  Five foot six inch San Jose blues? Cover your cut 10-09-2023 - 09:09
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? BOB2 10-10-2023 - 08:10
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? FUD 10-10-2023 - 10:25
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? RG 10-10-2023 - 19:46
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? FUD 10-11-2023 - 15:03


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  ********   ********   ******  
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **    **  **    ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **      **    **       
 ********   **     **  ********      **     **       
 **         **     **  **           **      **       
 **         **     **  **           **      **    ** 
 **          *******   **           **       ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com