Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...?
Author: FUD
Date: 10-11-2023 - 15:03

If BART would run in the middle of (or next to) 87, it could have a station right AT the airport. No long-distance monorail/peoplemover required. You could even hire Tesla and Boring to build the tunnels, using Model Ys to haul the passengers and their luggage.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose c 10-08-2023 - 09:57
  the-cost-of-the-vtas-san-jose-bart-extension-is-spiraling-out-of-control-2 Le Boring Real Title 10-08-2023 - 12:00
  Re: Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose david vartanoff 10-08-2023 - 23:32
  Re: Unhappy with 5-6 San Jose name 10-09-2023 - 06:40
  Five foot six inch San Jose blues? Cover your cut 10-09-2023 - 09:09
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? BOB2 10-10-2023 - 08:10
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? FUD 10-10-2023 - 10:25
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? RG 10-10-2023 - 19:46
  Re: Unhappy with $1.1 billion per mile cost...? FUD 10-11-2023 - 15:03


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **        **     **        **        ** 
  **  **   **         **   **         **        ** 
   ****    **          ** **          **        ** 
    **     **           ***           **        ** 
    **     **          ** **    **    **  **    ** 
    **     **         **   **   **    **  **    ** 
    **     ********  **     **   ******    ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com