 |
Re: Astronomy is fun....? And RR cuts are aimed at lots of things...
Author: BOB2
Date: 11-01-2023 - 00:44
Uranus is the seventh planer from the Sun, discovered by William Herschel in 1781 as Astronomer Royale for mad King George III, and also a frequent unreliable source of a lot of infromation on the inernet... It is also where most of this reponse was pulled from...
Nope we don't want to audit no billionaires, they never cheat on their taxes, do they? Even the fake billionaires never cheateither...
The cuts to CA's fair share of return (CA only get about 92 cenrs on the dollar of what we pay in to Washington in transportation taxes) is my biggest problem, and the cuts to Amtrak which are huge compared to the tiny Federal "cuts" for the small amounts going to CAHSRA. And that is regardless of any feeling about how that has or is being spent... Projects like Del Mar Bluffs, and the LOSSAN, LAUPT run-through, and ACE projects are also among the projects cuts.
not John E. Carson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> YOu really think it takes 100 billion to audit
> "The top .1 percent?" LOL But you read it in Vox
> it must be true. Rolling STone and MSDNC would
> never lie to you. Ignore the NYTimes multiple
> corrections behind the curtain.
>
> The majority will be diverted. And the audits will
> somehow be avoided if you continue to donate to
> the Dems. Like Dirty Joe and his family's at least
> 5 mil from China. Or U.Penn's 50 mil from China
> while his office was there. Or who bought Hunter's
> "art." I bet you're allergic to learning those
> facts.
>
> "So if you have an income of less than $400,000 as
> an individual you have no worries." LOL They've
> already lowered the income reporting threshold to
> $600 a year. You really didn't know that? Not
> reported in Dem echo chambers?
>
> Tax cuts can be dumb. But not when they promote
> economic activity that results in net higher tax
> receipts. Which has happened before. But has to be
> done wisely. I don't know if that happened with
> Trump. The ChiCom's germ warfare interrupted that.
> Y u no care bout their election interference?
>
> You want to cut the hiway funding to only the gas
> tax? Fine with me. And no funding for CAHSR
> without a user tax.
>
> Don't forget to increase EV taxes if gas taxes are
> the only road funds. You care about fairness,
> right?
>
>
> You want the continued much higher than normal
> recent funding of Amtrak to continue? Negotiate.
> Which means you have to give something up. As does
> the other side. Dems only want the non-Dems to
> compromise.
>
> To the other genius claiming Congress is
> controlled by the GOP. Spend 5 minutes on
> Wikipedia to learn the bare minimum basics. MUst
> be a Trains forum poster. Those commies are the
> dumbest of the dumb. In their own fantasy bubble.
> Maybe worse than even Liarwanna. Naw, no one is
> that bad. He's an intentional TO Tokyo Rose. Maybe
> paid to insert Dem talking points.
>
>
>
> Commenter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ooh! Facts. I love facts.
> >
> > 1. The federal gas tax hasn't been raised in 30
> > years and is not adjusted for inflation.
> >
> > 2. $280,000,000,000 has been taken from the
> > general fund to support the Interstate Highway
> > System in the last 15 years. This is tax money
> > paid by everyone, even those who can't afford a
> > car.
> >
> > 3. There are two ways to go broke: spend too
> much
> > or earn too little. Under the Trump
> administration
> > taxes on the top 0.1% were cut drastically,
> > thereby greatly increasing the national debt.
> >
> > 4. Audits of taxpayers in the top 0.1 percent
> of
> > the income distribution returned more than $6
> in
> > revenue for every dollar spent in audit
> resources,
> > much more than audits of lower-income
> taxpayers.
> > So guess where the audits are going to be?
> >
> > 5. "The IRS will increase focus on the high
> > wealth, high balance due taxpayer field
> > initiative. This effort targets taxpayers with
> > income of more than $1 million and tax debt
> > greater than $250,000. The IRS previously
> > collected $38 million from 175 taxpayers in
> this
> > group and plans to expand its efforts by
> > contacting approximately 1,600 additional
> > taxpayers in this category."
> >
> > 6. "The IRS is using new artificial
> intelligence
> > capabilities to expand its LPC program, which
> > audits some of the largest and most complex
> > partnerships, to include selection of
> additional
> > large partnerships and compliance risks."
> >
> > So if you have an income of less than $400,000
> as
> > an individual you have no worries. But if you
> > earned over $1 million and have been hiding
> stuff,
> > prayer may be called for. And if you are a
> "pass
> > through" fund or partnership hiding assets in
> > overseas locations, life is going to get very
> > interesting.
Nope we don't want to audit no billionaires, they never cheat on their taxes, do they? Even the fake billionaires never cheateither...
The cuts to CA's fair share of return (CA only get about 92 cenrs on the dollar of what we pay in to Washington in transportation taxes) is my biggest problem, and the cuts to Amtrak which are huge compared to the tiny Federal "cuts" for the small amounts going to CAHSRA. And that is regardless of any feeling about how that has or is being spent... Projects like Del Mar Bluffs, and the LOSSAN, LAUPT run-through, and ACE projects are also among the projects cuts.
not John E. Carson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> YOu really think it takes 100 billion to audit
> "The top .1 percent?" LOL But you read it in Vox
> it must be true. Rolling STone and MSDNC would
> never lie to you. Ignore the NYTimes multiple
> corrections behind the curtain.
>
> The majority will be diverted. And the audits will
> somehow be avoided if you continue to donate to
> the Dems. Like Dirty Joe and his family's at least
> 5 mil from China. Or U.Penn's 50 mil from China
> while his office was there. Or who bought Hunter's
> "art." I bet you're allergic to learning those
> facts.
>
> "So if you have an income of less than $400,000 as
> an individual you have no worries." LOL They've
> already lowered the income reporting threshold to
> $600 a year. You really didn't know that? Not
> reported in Dem echo chambers?
>
> Tax cuts can be dumb. But not when they promote
> economic activity that results in net higher tax
> receipts. Which has happened before. But has to be
> done wisely. I don't know if that happened with
> Trump. The ChiCom's germ warfare interrupted that.
> Y u no care bout their election interference?
>
> You want to cut the hiway funding to only the gas
> tax? Fine with me. And no funding for CAHSR
> without a user tax.
>
> Don't forget to increase EV taxes if gas taxes are
> the only road funds. You care about fairness,
> right?
>
>
> You want the continued much higher than normal
> recent funding of Amtrak to continue? Negotiate.
> Which means you have to give something up. As does
> the other side. Dems only want the non-Dems to
> compromise.
>
> To the other genius claiming Congress is
> controlled by the GOP. Spend 5 minutes on
> Wikipedia to learn the bare minimum basics. MUst
> be a Trains forum poster. Those commies are the
> dumbest of the dumb. In their own fantasy bubble.
> Maybe worse than even Liarwanna. Naw, no one is
> that bad. He's an intentional TO Tokyo Rose. Maybe
> paid to insert Dem talking points.
>
>
>
> Commenter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ooh! Facts. I love facts.
> >
> > 1. The federal gas tax hasn't been raised in 30
> > years and is not adjusted for inflation.
> >
> > 2. $280,000,000,000 has been taken from the
> > general fund to support the Interstate Highway
> > System in the last 15 years. This is tax money
> > paid by everyone, even those who can't afford a
> > car.
> >
> > 3. There are two ways to go broke: spend too
> much
> > or earn too little. Under the Trump
> administration
> > taxes on the top 0.1% were cut drastically,
> > thereby greatly increasing the national debt.
> >
> > 4. Audits of taxpayers in the top 0.1 percent
> of
> > the income distribution returned more than $6
> in
> > revenue for every dollar spent in audit
> resources,
> > much more than audits of lower-income
> taxpayers.
> > So guess where the audits are going to be?
> >
> > 5. "The IRS will increase focus on the high
> > wealth, high balance due taxpayer field
> > initiative. This effort targets taxpayers with
> > income of more than $1 million and tax debt
> > greater than $250,000. The IRS previously
> > collected $38 million from 175 taxpayers in
> this
> > group and plans to expand its efforts by
> > contacting approximately 1,600 additional
> > taxpayers in this category."
> >
> > 6. "The IRS is using new artificial
> intelligence
> > capabilities to expand its LPC program, which
> > audits some of the largest and most complex
> > partnerships, to include selection of
> additional
> > large partnerships and compliance risks."
> >
> > So if you have an income of less than $400,000
> as
> > an individual you have no worries. But if you
> > earned over $1 million and have been hiding
> stuff,
> > prayer may be called for. And if you are a
> "pass
> > through" fund or partnership hiding assets in
> > overseas locations, life is going to get very
> > interesting.
