Man, I love coming in here to your zany conspiracies! They make my day.

El Trolio Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >> Alleged smoke for a non-existent fire. The only
> way they can become voters, GOPlican't or Dem, is
> by becoming citizens, which is a long, drawn out
> process that takes years once you're granted
> residency in the US.
>
> > They're heavily into stealing the identities of
> other people and then it's easy to get ballots
> sent to them.
>
> And they're hiding under your bed, waiting for you
> to go to sleep, at which time they're going crawl
> out and do nasty things to you.
>
> Why is it that Obama deported more of these
> individuals in each of his terms that bonespurs
> did in his one term. Oh wait a minute, bonespurs
> needed cheap domestics and grounds keepers for
> Mar-a-Lardo, not to mention the Poles he used to
> build one of his highrises in NYC (and failed to
> pay them).
>
> >> This explains why the Democrat party insists
> that voters don't have to show photo I.D.
>
> > Phooey.
>
> > Okay, wise ass, explain to us why the Democrat
> party works so hard at making sure voters don't
> have to show photo I.D. This oughtta be good. Let
> me get some popcorn and pull up a chair.
>
> You have to show proof of citizenship (and
> residence) in order to register to vote. Once this
> is done, you appear on the voter rolls. What you
> GOPlican'ts want is to make this necessary for
> each and every election, which is voter
> suppression.
>
> > and that they can ask for a "provisional
> ballot"
>
> >> Not unless they're citizens.
>
> > It should be offered only to military personnel,
> those who are laid up in hospitals and a few other
> selected applications.
>
> So people like me who had jobs which spent time
> out of town on an unpredictable basis should be
> denied an absentee ballot? Talk about ballot
> rigging . . .
>
> If it turned out that I was home on election day,
> I would walk to the poling place up the street and
> insert my ballot in the same dropbox where the
> ballots cast at the polling place were collected.
> The precinct workers always politely declined to
> do this on my behalf. My name no longer appeared
> on the list of those eligible to vote at this
> polling place.
>
> > The easier you make it for people to vote,
>
> The easier it is for people to vote against you,
> which is really what you're worried about.
>
> >> voting-by-ballot harvester
>
> > Which is illegal.
>
> > Wrong. It's done in California and several other
> states --- all blue of course.
>
> Are you accusing the USPS of ballot harvesting?
>
> >> voting-by-dropbox.
>
> >Which is not much different than voting by
> absentee ballot. In fact, you can deposit an
> absentee ballot in a drop box.
>
> > Very susceptable to fraud, and that's why
> Democrats love it so much.
>
> Voting by drop box is no different that mail in
> voting, which by your twisted logic is the USPS
> engaging in ballot harvesting.
>
> >> The Democrats want to make it as easy as
> possible for anyone to vote who wants to and if
> anyone starts questioning the eligibility of a
> voter, that is viewed as "voter suppression".
>
> > GOPlican voting shenanigans are voter
> suppression.
>
> > You're pivoting. Another lame-ass response. If
> anyone's good at "voting shenanigans", it's the
> Dems.
>
> Then why all the GOPlican shenanigans with
> reapportionment and what-not?
>
> >> The cheating tactics worked like a charm four
> years ago.
>
> > Some sixty court rulings disagree with you.
>
> > The courts ran away from the issue -- like
> they'll probably do again.
>
> You're just sore that they didn't rule the way you
> wanted them to. Courts can be funny in this
> respect.
>
> >> The Republicans will have to hold some more
> hearings
>
> > In order to find some paltry excuse to impeach
> Biden.
>
> > Tit for tat, if nothing else. How about money
> laundering with the Chinese?
>
> Are you referring to EX-presidinky bonespurs and
> his son in law?
>
> > How about allowing the country to be invaded by
> MILLIONS of people?
>
> Hasn't happened, although I sure you'll swear up
> and down on a stack of bibles that it has.
>
> > How about defying SCOTUS rulings?
>
> Much as you'd like to think they do, the Dems
> don't defy judges like bonsepurs does.
>
> Now, time for you to make with some more of your
> disinformational harum-scarum and insecurity
> links.