 |
Re: Undocumented Democrats Log New Mileage
Author: Nemesis of "El Trollio"
Date: 01-25-2024 - 18:35
>> Have you noticed that the biased, left-leaning, corrupt Main Stream Media is as much in favor of illegal immigration as you are? Libs who love illegal immigration treat "Angel Moms" like excrement. You're in favor of illegal immigration so I'm sure you wouldn't give an "Angel Mom" the time of day.
> No I haven't, and all appearances are that I read more and better fact-checked media than you.
If THAT was the case you would be informed about "Angel Moms" to a point where you could discuss them. Instead, you're not even acknowledging their existence. You're just like the Main Stream Media. Yep, maybe one of these days one of your family members will be injured or killed by one or more illegal aliens and then you'll have a whole different attitude. Or maybe you'll be killed by one and we wouldn't need to have these hopeless conversations.
[www.foxnews.com]
[www.foxnews.com]
>> Let's see some sources for these allegations. CNN and MSDNC don't count.
> In that case, absolutely none of your insecurity links count.
You've never counted them from day one. They may not count FOR YOU. But there are others that read this beside you.
>> Okay, wise ass, explain to us why the Democrat party works so hard at making sure voters don't have to show photo I.D.
> Voters do, particularly to register.
But not TO VOTE. You're pivoting. The whole controversy is whether voters should have to produce a photo I.D. TO VOTE. Pay attention and stop pivoting.
>> This oughtta be good. Let me get some popcorn and pull up a chair.
> OK, fatso, but don't forget the 12 pack of brewskies.
While you're running away from answering questions, here's three more you can cowardly run away from:
(1.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why did he allow the Title authorization to lapse?
(2.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why did he end the Remain in Mexico policy that President Trump had negotiated?
(3.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why has he allowed hundreds of thousands of illegals to enter the country, unvaxxed and unvetted, and why do illegals get to go through a less-stringent security protocol with TSA compared to U.S. citizens?
>>> Not unless they're citizens.
>> How do you know? Let's see a source for your assertions.
> Personal experience.
Not good enough. You're probably lying. Show me something in writing or a link. I'm sure this is an assignment that you can't fulfill -- like so many others.
>> When I said "a few other selected applications" that would involve someone in your situation.
> Yadda ydadda yadda
A PTSD flashback?
>> We should go back to voting the way we voted back in the 1960s or 1970s. It wasn't until the Dems started changing all the specifics of how we vote that things started getting _ ucked up.
> In your way of thinking, "_ucked up" is another way of saying "I suddenly realized conservatives are a minority party".
We'll see how much of a minority party they are this November. It will just be a question of how much the Chinese and Big Tech interfere with the election.
>>> Are you accusing the USPS of ballot harvesting?
>> No dipwad. It's 100% legal in California and it doesn't involve the USPS. Do some research.
> No it is not. The return envelopes for my absentee ballots (in California) have always had plain language printed on them to prohibit such practices.
It's legal in California and it doesn't have anything to do with the USPS. Educate yourself. I know that's a tall order, but still ...
>> B u l l s h i t. We won't have honest elections until we go back to the way we voted 40 or 50 years ago. Explain to me why all the changes were made. Convenience? _uck convenience. Honest elections are more important.
>You've just proven my point: you (and your GOPlo-MAGA clowns) want to make voting as inconvenient as possible for your political enemies.
And, conversely, you Dems want to make it as casual as using the urinal at the Palmdale McDonalds.
>> Then why all the GOPlican shenanigans with reapportionment and what-not?
> So the GOP has reapportionment and the Dems have dead people, ficticious people and illegal aliens vote.
The flip side is that Judicial Watch and some other groups has filed some successful lawsuits over the dirty voter rolls and problem-prone voting machines. Hopefully there will be a lot of changes in how things are done in November compared to November of 2020.
Anyway, I'm done. I've wasted too much time here talking to you because it's too similar to talking to a brick wall. Go back to just replying "Yadda Yadda Yadda" to everything. When you do that it makes you contribute to the conversation on a more intelligent level. So you can imagine what THAT says about your contributions.
Maybe we'll see a new Civil War between Texas and Washington D.C. Put on your blue uniform and you can wave a Mexican flag as you're charging Signal Hill in Long Beach.
> No I haven't, and all appearances are that I read more and better fact-checked media than you.
If THAT was the case you would be informed about "Angel Moms" to a point where you could discuss them. Instead, you're not even acknowledging their existence. You're just like the Main Stream Media. Yep, maybe one of these days one of your family members will be injured or killed by one or more illegal aliens and then you'll have a whole different attitude. Or maybe you'll be killed by one and we wouldn't need to have these hopeless conversations.
[www.foxnews.com]
[www.foxnews.com]
>> Let's see some sources for these allegations. CNN and MSDNC don't count.
> In that case, absolutely none of your insecurity links count.
You've never counted them from day one. They may not count FOR YOU. But there are others that read this beside you.
>> Okay, wise ass, explain to us why the Democrat party works so hard at making sure voters don't have to show photo I.D.
> Voters do, particularly to register.
But not TO VOTE. You're pivoting. The whole controversy is whether voters should have to produce a photo I.D. TO VOTE. Pay attention and stop pivoting.
>> This oughtta be good. Let me get some popcorn and pull up a chair.
> OK, fatso, but don't forget the 12 pack of brewskies.
While you're running away from answering questions, here's three more you can cowardly run away from:
(1.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why did he allow the Title authorization to lapse?
(2.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why did he end the Remain in Mexico policy that President Trump had negotiated?
(3.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why has he allowed hundreds of thousands of illegals to enter the country, unvaxxed and unvetted, and why do illegals get to go through a less-stringent security protocol with TSA compared to U.S. citizens?
>>> Not unless they're citizens.
>> How do you know? Let's see a source for your assertions.
> Personal experience.
Not good enough. You're probably lying. Show me something in writing or a link. I'm sure this is an assignment that you can't fulfill -- like so many others.
>> When I said "a few other selected applications" that would involve someone in your situation.
> Yadda ydadda yadda
A PTSD flashback?
>> We should go back to voting the way we voted back in the 1960s or 1970s. It wasn't until the Dems started changing all the specifics of how we vote that things started getting _ ucked up.
> In your way of thinking, "_ucked up" is another way of saying "I suddenly realized conservatives are a minority party".
We'll see how much of a minority party they are this November. It will just be a question of how much the Chinese and Big Tech interfere with the election.
>>> Are you accusing the USPS of ballot harvesting?
>> No dipwad. It's 100% legal in California and it doesn't involve the USPS. Do some research.
> No it is not. The return envelopes for my absentee ballots (in California) have always had plain language printed on them to prohibit such practices.
It's legal in California and it doesn't have anything to do with the USPS. Educate yourself. I know that's a tall order, but still ...
>> B u l l s h i t. We won't have honest elections until we go back to the way we voted 40 or 50 years ago. Explain to me why all the changes were made. Convenience? _uck convenience. Honest elections are more important.
>You've just proven my point: you (and your GOPlo-MAGA clowns) want to make voting as inconvenient as possible for your political enemies.
And, conversely, you Dems want to make it as casual as using the urinal at the Palmdale McDonalds.
>> Then why all the GOPlican shenanigans with reapportionment and what-not?
> So the GOP has reapportionment and the Dems have dead people, ficticious people and illegal aliens vote.
The flip side is that Judicial Watch and some other groups has filed some successful lawsuits over the dirty voter rolls and problem-prone voting machines. Hopefully there will be a lot of changes in how things are done in November compared to November of 2020.
Anyway, I'm done. I've wasted too much time here talking to you because it's too similar to talking to a brick wall. Go back to just replying "Yadda Yadda Yadda" to everything. When you do that it makes you contribute to the conversation on a more intelligent level. So you can imagine what THAT says about your contributions.
Maybe we'll see a new Civil War between Texas and Washington D.C. Put on your blue uniform and you can wave a Mexican flag as you're charging Signal Hill in Long Beach.
