>> Have you noticed that the biased, left-leaning, corrupt Main Stream Media is as much in favor of illegal immigration as you are?

Only in your erratic thought processes.

> You're in favor of illegal immigration . . .

Apparently you can't perform the simple task of reading what I've already stated plainly, never mind the slightly more difficult cerebral task of comprehending it.

> [www.foxnews.com]

> [www.foxnews.com]

Ahh, Faux news (and Disinformation). Didn't it recently lose a multi-million dollar lawsuit for falsely accusing a voting machine company of ballot tampering?

>> Let's see some sources for these allegations. CNN and MSDNC don't count.

> In that case, absolutely none of your insecurity links count.

>> You've never counted them from day one.

I look at them every now and then, and never found anything but harum-scarum, disinformation, and factoids.

>> Okay, wise ass, explain to us why the Democrat party works so hard at making sure voters don't have to show photo I.D.

> Voters do, particularly to register.

> But not TO VOTE. You're pivoting. The whole controversy is whether voters should have to produce a photo I.D. TO VOTE.

Cut and pasted from the California Secretary of State website:

"When you registered to vote, you were asked to provide your driver license number, California identification number, or the last four digits of your Social Security number."

and

"Vote in person: prior to receiving your ballot at your polling location, you may be asked to provide an acceptable form of identification."

and

"Anyone may return your ballot for you, as long as they do not get paid on a per ballot basis. In order for your ballot to be counted, you must fill out the authorization section found on the outside of your ballot envelope."

Pay attention and stop pivoting.

>> How do you know? Let's see a source for your assertions.

> Personal experience.

> Not good enough. You're probably lying. Show me something in writing or a link. I'm sure this is an assignment that you can't fulfill -- like so many others.

Weak, very weak.

> [ballot havesting] It's legal in California and it doesn't have anything to do with the USPS.

No, it is not, which is contained in the language stated above about your authorizing, in writing on the envelope, said person to return your ballot on your behalf and NOT GETTING PAID TO DO SO. Educate yourself. It's become rather obvious that this is a tall order.

>> B u l l s h i t. We won't have honest elections until we go back to the way we voted 40 or 50 years ago. Explain to me why all the changes were made. Convenience? _uck convenience. Honest elections are more important.

> You've just proven my point: you (and your GOPlo-MAGA clowns) want to make voting as inconvenient as possible for your political enemies.

>> And, conversely, you Dems want to make it as casual as using the urinal at the Palmdale McDonalds.

You/(Fake)Bob2/TOMN/Nancy Doo-Doo have a weird fixation with McDonalds restrooms.

> Anyway, I'm done.

You were done before you started.

> Maybe we'll see a new Civil War between Texas and Washington D.C.

Mr Trumpster, have you read the Constitution? Obviously not. While you've been sitting before your keyboard frantically typing away with eyes wide shut, the SCOTUS has already ruled against Texas. This is because the Tex-Mex border is between sovereign nations, and US national sovereignty issues are the province of the Federal Government, not any State Government's. It's no different with the US-Can boarder up North.