> Abott is attempting to operate beyond his powers, not to mention engaging in mindless adrenaline-rush political theater.
Abbott is doing what the Constitution allows, and that's why he has the support of 25 other governors. Oh, wait. I'm sure you think that THEY'RE all wrong, too. That's the way to roll.
Texas and its backers represent the legitimate government, Biden does not. Watch this video and you MIGHT learn something:
[
hugh.cdn.rumble.cloud]
> If the situation across the US-Mex border is so bad, why then have the GOPlo-faketriots so consistently sandbagged the appropriation of funds to alleviate the situation?
Have they? That lame excuse by the Dems (claiming the the Republicans have been non-cooperative) is just their way of kicking the can down the road.
Here's the questions you
SHOULD be asking yourself, but you're too much of a libtard to do so:
(1.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why did he allow the Title 42 authority to lapse?
(2.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why did he end the Remain in Mexico policy that President Trump had negotiated?
(3.) If Biden is serious about enforcing immigration laws as he claims, why has he allowed hundreds of thousands of illegals to enter the country, unvaxxed and unvetted, and why do illegals get to go through a less-stringent security protocol with TSA compared to U.S. citizens?
Listen to what's said at the 03:00 mark by Berkeley Constitutional law professor John Yoo. But, I'm sure with your degree of arrogance, you're convinced that Yoo is full of s h i t and you know more than he does. Give me your reasons for rejecting his analysis in its entirety. It can't be because Yoo is on the payroll of Fox News, because he isn't. Do you now systematically reject anything coming from U.C. Constitutional law professors or just those professors from the Berkeley campus? Do you have to cart your arrogance and ego around in a wheel barrow?
[
vod.foxnews.com]