Steve Carter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Who is willing to show off their knowledge of the
> Cascade Tunnel and explain the differences in
> length. Currently the signage states 7.8 and
> 41152 feet (7.793 miles). The signs from the 1953
> photos show 8 miles. So how did loose 2 tenths
> of a mile in 56 years? I noticed that the notes
> with the photos indicate 7.79 miles. Maybe it was
> never 8 miles, just sounded better to a proud GN?
This tunnel has been extended (slightly) two times since it was first built, but that doesn't explain how it could have been 8 miles at one time. Perhaps 8 miles was considered accurate enough for a portal sign.
Here's a link discussing the 2 length changes (caused by installation and later modification of the fan system).
[
www.gngoat.org]
And Google provided a (1956)!!! Popular Mechanics article discussing installation of the fan system (with a couple of B&W photos, including one that clearly shows the portal sign displaying "8 miles"):
[
books.google.com]