 |
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
Author: Eugene
Date: 12-10-2006 - 16:59
Lots of folks around Sacramento are talking about rails to trails on the old CCT. One fly in the ointment, however:
That line has NEVER been abandoned. CCT still owns it. Its simply embargoed.
What does this mean? Who knows. But its interesting. I heard that they have a new customer at Woodbridge, so they're going father north than they have in a few years.
E
That line has NEVER been abandoned. CCT still owns it. Its simply embargoed.
What does this mean? Who knows. But its interesting. I heard that they have a new customer at Woodbridge, so they're going father north than they have in a few years.
E
| Subject | Written By | Date/Time (PST) |
|---|---|---|
 Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
rantoul | 12-08-2006 - 11:18 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
Earl Pitts | 12-08-2006 - 17:31 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
Mike Swanson | 12-08-2006 - 23:48 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
David Epling | 12-10-2006 - 00:02 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
Matt Muldoon | 12-10-2006 - 11:10 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
Rich Hun | 12-10-2006 - 14:29 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines |
Eugene | 12-10-2006 - 16:59 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
dave buccolo | 12-13-2006 - 17:24 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
David Epling | 12-14-2006 - 19:53 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
Eugene | 12-15-2006 - 17:11 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
S. L. Murray | 12-16-2006 - 10:27 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
dave buccolo | 12-16-2006 - 22:02 |
|
Re: Reactivation of long gone rail lines
|
A.S.Perger | 12-26-2006 - 11:20 |