 |
JFranz2777
Author: Rate Payer
Date: 06-12-2013 - 10:15
JFranz2777 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's OK, wait until SCE attempts to recoup the
> 600-700 million it has sunk into the plant in a
> last ditch effort to get it open again - not to
> mention the X-million dollars it will cost (us) to
> dismantle and clean it all up (you can bet SCE
> will deliberately go bankrupt BEFORE it pays THAT
> money out). Maybe they'll get a nice
> jet-engine-type power plant like we have here in
> Burbank, CA which has sat virtually unused since
> it was built and opened (with great fanfare and
> BS) a couple of years ago. It's great, but sounds
> like a squadron of beserk jet fighters on startup.
> It only dumps out slightly used jet fuel into the
> air (how nice!). When the lights go out, see how
> fast the Nimbys scream for more nukes or even
> (shudder) coal.
1) Edison and SDGE rate payers have been paying a few cents a month since the 60's to pay for
San Onofree's retirement, extra costs will be covered by the shareholders, Mitsubishi and the insurance companies.
2) Jet Turbines are extreemly expensive to operate and are used only if the system is about to crash
3) AQMD rules wont allow Coal or Oil to be burned in California and even certain Natural Gas boilers cannot be used (too bad they cant turn San Onofre into a huge coal plant with rail access and unlimited supply of sea water)
4) If the lights go out because of the loss of San Onofre then put the blame on Barbara Boxer, No-Nuke Kooks, NIMBYs, and Greenies
25% capacity has been lost and they should have waited until replacements were in place
My employer is ready to leave Irvine if there is a single blackout.
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's OK, wait until SCE attempts to recoup the
> 600-700 million it has sunk into the plant in a
> last ditch effort to get it open again - not to
> mention the X-million dollars it will cost (us) to
> dismantle and clean it all up (you can bet SCE
> will deliberately go bankrupt BEFORE it pays THAT
> money out). Maybe they'll get a nice
> jet-engine-type power plant like we have here in
> Burbank, CA which has sat virtually unused since
> it was built and opened (with great fanfare and
> BS) a couple of years ago. It's great, but sounds
> like a squadron of beserk jet fighters on startup.
> It only dumps out slightly used jet fuel into the
> air (how nice!). When the lights go out, see how
> fast the Nimbys scream for more nukes or even
> (shudder) coal.
1) Edison and SDGE rate payers have been paying a few cents a month since the 60's to pay for
San Onofree's retirement, extra costs will be covered by the shareholders, Mitsubishi and the insurance companies.
2) Jet Turbines are extreemly expensive to operate and are used only if the system is about to crash
3) AQMD rules wont allow Coal or Oil to be burned in California and even certain Natural Gas boilers cannot be used (too bad they cant turn San Onofre into a huge coal plant with rail access and unlimited supply of sea water)
4) If the lights go out because of the loss of San Onofre then put the blame on Barbara Boxer, No-Nuke Kooks, NIMBYs, and Greenies
25% capacity has been lost and they should have waited until replacements were in place
My employer is ready to leave Irvine if there is a single blackout.
