Glen Icanberry wrote:

"If you can find Valley Division Vignettes please only buy the first edition with TWO authors, which was published before the Kriepers decided to rip me off. In 1988 the Kriepers secretly reprinted the second edition, exactly the same, but with my name removed, as an author. Despite what the copyright notice says, in both editions of the book, I have the original copyright from the Library of Congress in my possession which shows TWO authors."


The use of phrases such as "... the Kriepers decided to rip me off." and "... secretely reprinted ... but with my name removed, ..." both suggest the basis for legal action. I'm curious if you did explore any such issues, and if so what did the courts find? If you did not take legal action, why not? Hearing only your side makes me believe you have been treated unfairly; nevertheless I wonder what the other side has presented as its defense of these actions. Please elaborate.

(I don't know ANY of the parties named, and have no legal or financial interest in the outcome. I'm just a curious person who likes to follow-up on situations like this.)

Thank you, and best regards to all.

Chuck Lee.