Re: And then there was rail
Author: BN Oly
Date: 01-27-2015 - 13:10

Goober Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FRA regulations that have been imposed over the
> last few years make CWR on anything but a class 1
> too costly to maintain. Shortlines have to
> maintain distressing records and tests,
> tie standards, anchor standards etc...any
> maintance savings from CWR is lost on the
> requirements that have recently been imposed.

Do the new rules apply to new relays of CWR, or would existing CWR need to be inspected the same?



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  And then there was rail Howard 01-26-2015 - 18:26
  Re: And then there was rail M. Harris 01-26-2015 - 18:45
  Re: And then there was rail Curious 01-26-2015 - 21:16
  Re: And then there was rail Hank 01-26-2015 - 23:08
  Re: And then there was rail Howard 01-26-2015 - 23:19
  Re: And then there was rail Goober 01-27-2015 - 09:16
  Re: And then there was rail BN Oly 01-27-2015 - 13:10
  Re: And then there was rail Rasputin 01-27-2015 - 14:59
  Re: And then there was rail Curious 01-27-2015 - 18:57
  Re: Jointed to CWR Matt Farnsworth 01-27-2015 - 19:53
  Re: Jointed to CWR cctgm 01-27-2015 - 21:51
  Re: Jointed to CWR JMann 01-28-2015 - 08:41


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   **     **  ********    ******   **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **    **  ***   *** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **        **** **** 
  ********  **     **  ********   **        ** *** ** 
        **   **   **   **     **  **        **     ** 
 **     **    ** **    **     **  **    **  **     ** 
  *******      ***     ********    ******   **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com