Re: Did UPRR retain right of return
Author: Espee99
Date: 09-03-2016 - 11:06

Then it is simple, no train UPRR takes the line back and no trail. Think after all the monies spent they would do what they planned, both rail and trail.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Transportation leaders seek clarity on Santa Cruz County rail corridor Cruz News 09-02-2016 - 09:36
  Re: Transportation leaders seek clarity on Santa Cruz County rail corridor Negin 09-02-2016 - 09:46
  Re: Transportation leaders seek clarity on Santa Cruz County rail corridor Real Rail Trail 09-02-2016 - 09:50
  Re: Transportation leaders seek clarity on Santa Cruz County rail corridor jdm 09-02-2016 - 14:41
  Did UPRR retain right of return Espee99 09-02-2016 - 17:35
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return Sand Dome 09-02-2016 - 21:23
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return Espee99 09-03-2016 - 11:06
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return Howard 09-03-2016 - 11:19
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return Sand Dome 09-03-2016 - 21:04
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return Luis 09-07-2016 - 12:15
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return Sand Dome 09-08-2016 - 12:04
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return -- like the Monterey branch Dragoman 09-06-2016 - 19:39
  Re: Did UPRR retain right of return -- like the Monterey branch clipper841 09-06-2016 - 21:20


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **  ********   **      **  ********  
 ***   ***  **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     ** 
 **** ****  **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     ** 
 ** *** **  *********  **     **  **  **  **  ********  
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **        
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **        
 **     **  **     **  ********    ***  ***   **        
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com