 |
Re: The only Lithium that Mouse is worried about, ain't in batteries....
Author: BOB2
Date: 10-29-2019 - 06:10
Mouse is a train hating troll who's mental state has deteriorated markedly over the years as his ferroequinephobia has progressed and his obsession with evil BART has caused him to increasingly reach out with his increasingly bizarre and desperate memes, mostly to attract these other three pus oozing loser trolls, who share his desire to troll a train site...
Given Mouse's propensity for wildly trolling every death by train, I'd bet Mouse doesn't really give a rat's a$$ about peoples safety... When people do die, even if it is their fault, or even when it is no one's fault, to Mouse it is always the result of an "evil" train, and it must be stopped... The evil train that is....
The only thing about "lithium" that Mouse is really worried about is the lithium mom secretly tries to put in his food, so he stops having more and more of these hallucinations, hearing more of those "voices" that leak through his tinfoil hat, that warn him about what the "evil" conspiracy is really up to....
FUD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's probably worried about lithium-ion batteries
> in the buses exploding or burning, as has happened
> with Teslas (when seriously damaged). While I
> won't say it can't happen (it certainly can,
> especially if something goes wrong with the
> charging system or if a bus is hauled in after an
> incident that damages the battery), it should be
> unlikely in normal use.
>
> Isn't Potrero a trolley bus yard now? If so, note
> that most of the current-model trolley buses also
> have a traction (high-voltage) battery for
> short-range off-wire running. So even if it were
> to stay trolley-bus-only with housing on top, the
> potential for a battery incident would exist. Just
> smaller than one with the larger-capacity
> batteries used in battery-only buses.
>
> Note, too, that the diesel-hybrid buses have a
> battery that's large enough for short-distance
> electric-only operations. So covering a bus yard
> serving the hybrid fleet would have the same
> potential issue.
>
> Finally, it's an engineering/architectural issue
> really. As with housing over commercial space
> (common enough in SF), it's necessary to have a
> fire block between the different uses. If designed
> and built properly, I see no reason why housing
> could not be constructed over a bus yard
> especially if the buses are entirely or mostly
> electric. It'll be expensive, but what isn't in
> SF?
Given Mouse's propensity for wildly trolling every death by train, I'd bet Mouse doesn't really give a rat's a$$ about peoples safety... When people do die, even if it is their fault, or even when it is no one's fault, to Mouse it is always the result of an "evil" train, and it must be stopped... The evil train that is....
The only thing about "lithium" that Mouse is really worried about is the lithium mom secretly tries to put in his food, so he stops having more and more of these hallucinations, hearing more of those "voices" that leak through his tinfoil hat, that warn him about what the "evil" conspiracy is really up to....
FUD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's probably worried about lithium-ion batteries
> in the buses exploding or burning, as has happened
> with Teslas (when seriously damaged). While I
> won't say it can't happen (it certainly can,
> especially if something goes wrong with the
> charging system or if a bus is hauled in after an
> incident that damages the battery), it should be
> unlikely in normal use.
>
> Isn't Potrero a trolley bus yard now? If so, note
> that most of the current-model trolley buses also
> have a traction (high-voltage) battery for
> short-range off-wire running. So even if it were
> to stay trolley-bus-only with housing on top, the
> potential for a battery incident would exist. Just
> smaller than one with the larger-capacity
> batteries used in battery-only buses.
>
> Note, too, that the diesel-hybrid buses have a
> battery that's large enough for short-distance
> electric-only operations. So covering a bus yard
> serving the hybrid fleet would have the same
> potential issue.
>
> Finally, it's an engineering/architectural issue
> really. As with housing over commercial space
> (common enough in SF), it's necessary to have a
> fire block between the different uses. If designed
> and built properly, I see no reason why housing
> could not be constructed over a bus yard
> especially if the buses are entirely or mostly
> electric. It'll be expensive, but what isn't in
> SF?
