Re: Why "Big Jacks"?
Author: hepkema
Date: 12-15-2008 - 12:27

I was in the WP's Engineering Dept. at that time. My boss wasn't concerned about them at all, but was interested in seing how they handled the mant 10-degree curves in the Canyon. My favorite reaction was in talking to the West End Roadmaster a couple of days later. He about went pale when I mentioned it to him. At that time, the First Sub (Altamont Pass included) had some remaining 100# rail in place on the mainline. I think he had visions of broken joint bars everywhere he looked.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Why "Big Jacks"? Mike Stimpson 12-11-2008 - 09:09
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? John Bromley 12-11-2008 - 10:30
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? Caboverbob 12-13-2008 - 19:33
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? - WP 4 axle vs. 6 axle George Andrews 12-14-2008 - 09:01
  Re: WP 4 axle vs. 6 axle SP5103 12-14-2008 - 11:50
  Re: WP 4 axle vs. 6 axle George Andrews 12-14-2008 - 15:34
  Re: Trade-ins for WP's U30Bs OPRRMS 12-16-2008 - 23:11
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? hepkema 12-15-2008 - 12:27
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? George Andrews 12-15-2008 - 19:08
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? J 12-15-2008 - 20:26
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? - Heavy Locomotives George Andrews 12-16-2008 - 16:14
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? Q 12-19-2008 - 23:01


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **               **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 **    **         **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 **    **         **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 **    **         **  **     **  **        ********* 
 *********  **    **  **     **  **        **     ** 
       **   **    **  **     **  **        **     ** 
       **    ******    *******   ********  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com