Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco
Author: I am not a crook
Date: 09-28-2024 - 05:26

https://vintagenewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/4.bp_.blogspot.comchevy-vega-vert-a-pac-2-fa8a32c6658f36550abb377f1d7151bec8c9f611.jpg

When Chevrolet started designing ‘Vega’ during the 1970s, one of the main objectives was to keep the cost of the car down around $2,000 in circa-1970 dollars.

At the time, the freight charge for moving a loaded railroad car from the Lordstown assembly plant to the Pacific coast – the longest distance that cars produced at Lordstown would need to travel – was around $4,800.

Since the Vega was a subcompact, it was possible to squeeze three more cars on a railroad car for a total of eighteen, instead of the usual fifteen. But that still worked out to around $300 per car – a substantial surcharge for a $2000 car.

If only Chevrolet could get more Vegas on a railroad car, the cost per unit of hauling them would go down.

The engineers at GM and the Southern Pacific Railroad came up with a clever solution. Instead of loading the cars horizontally, the Vegas will be placed vertically on a specially designed auto-rack – the Vert-A-Pac. Within the same volume of an 89-foot car, the Vert-A-Pac could hold as many as 30 automobiles instead of 18.

The Vega was hugely popular when it was introduced in 1970 however it quickly earned a reputation for unreliability, rust, safety issues and lousy engine durability. When the Vega was discontinued, the Vert-A-Pac cars had to be retired as they were too specialized to be used with anything else.

The Vert-A-Pac racks were scrapped, and the underlying flatcars went on to other uses.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  A new car!!!! Price is Right circa 1976 09-28-2024 - 00:33
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco I am not a crook 09-28-2024 - 05:26
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco FUD 09-28-2024 - 09:22
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco Kansei engineering 09-28-2024 - 17:22
  I meant to use Kaizen as my handle guy above at 17:22 09-28-2024 - 17:30
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco D. B. Arthur 09-28-2024 - 23:11
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco FUD 09-29-2024 - 07:31
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco? No, it was not the railcar, it was definitely the car... BOB2 09-29-2024 - 08:13
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco? No, it was not the railcar, it was definitely the car... anon 09-29-2024 - 09:44
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco? No, it was not the railcar, it was definitely the car... FUD 09-29-2024 - 14:47
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco? No, it was not the railcar, it was definitely the car... Chuck 09-30-2024 - 12:38
  Re: The vert-a-pac fiasco? No, it was not the railcar, it was definitely the car... George Andrews 09-29-2024 - 20:46
  Re: A new car!!!! TPIR 09-29-2024 - 20:09
  Re: A new car!!!! OP 09-29-2024 - 23:05


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **    **  ********  ********   **    ** 
  **  **   **   **   **        **     **  ***   ** 
   ****    **  **    **        **     **  ****  ** 
    **     *****     ******    **     **  ** ** ** 
    **     **  **    **        **     **  **  **** 
    **     **   **   **        **     **  **   *** 
    **     **    **  **        ********   **    ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com