 |
Re: Meanwhile for the adults who want facts, but don't like it when they conflict with their one individual purported data point?.
Author: BOB2
Date: 09-30-2024 - 19:25
Re: Meanwhile for the adults who want facts, and not just spin on EV ranges? You are an outlier in the observed population being sampled FUD.....
Author: Clem
Date: 09-30-2024 - 18:08
When my personal experience conflicts with your “study” I will call BS on your “facts.” I can reasonably infer from this exchange that I own N = 2 more EVs than you, dear gas guzzler. That said, you are certainly entitled to your strongly held opinions, do hold forth, please!
Poor Clem, when the observed data, across a sample of the population of actual use patterns, as well as the personal experience of many others in this complex and highly variable multifaceted real world, conflicts with your particular views or single data point of experience on this, I can always count on you to tell me that this kind of third-party independent finding that I sourced sucks, right?
So, what is new about this kind of sophistry coming from you aimed at me, when you get fact checked (even by FUD, on that BS you prattled about Caltrain dynamic braking)?
Yep, I'm just another politically incorrect "evil" old fart with one pick-up truck that put a little over 2,000 miles on it last year according to my smog check guy, with a "geezer pass" on the MTA, and a free retiree pass on Amtrak for my home road, who is doing my very damnedest to destroy the planet single handedly.
And ain't I just one awful SOB for calling a wee bit of observed data-based BS on some of that nonsense that was posted above?
My BAD!
Author: Clem
Date: 09-30-2024 - 18:08
When my personal experience conflicts with your “study” I will call BS on your “facts.” I can reasonably infer from this exchange that I own N = 2 more EVs than you, dear gas guzzler. That said, you are certainly entitled to your strongly held opinions, do hold forth, please!
Poor Clem, when the observed data, across a sample of the population of actual use patterns, as well as the personal experience of many others in this complex and highly variable multifaceted real world, conflicts with your particular views or single data point of experience on this, I can always count on you to tell me that this kind of third-party independent finding that I sourced sucks, right?
So, what is new about this kind of sophistry coming from you aimed at me, when you get fact checked (even by FUD, on that BS you prattled about Caltrain dynamic braking)?
Yep, I'm just another politically incorrect "evil" old fart with one pick-up truck that put a little over 2,000 miles on it last year according to my smog check guy, with a "geezer pass" on the MTA, and a free retiree pass on Amtrak for my home road, who is doing my very damnedest to destroy the planet single handedly.
And ain't I just one awful SOB for calling a wee bit of observed data-based BS on some of that nonsense that was posted above?
My BAD!
