Re: What is also an issue
Author: Severe Duty
Date: 09-05-2010 - 09:33

Of the many problems associated with outdoor/field/action photography as opposed to studio/controlled/staged photography is the conditions are often constantly changing. While digital photography has come a long way since its embarrasingly horrible beginnings, the choice to use the correct filters, lens focal lengths et. al. remains the same as it does when using film, and can be instantly upended by a cloud drifting over the sun, or a street light coming on, or a car's headlights suddenly appearing during a night photo session. This is in total disregard to whether film or digital is used or whatever darkroom/lightroom techniques are used in the post-session work-up.

One factor I see involved in railway photography is that the subject tends to be moving during most opportunites, and that limits the amount of time available to get the shot. This has often caused me to forsake applying the polarizing filter, or the 2A or carefully setting the right shutter speed/aperature combination. I have, on several occasions, lost the perfect shot even after having been in the best position, properly set up, re-checked my set-up, etc. because I didn't have any idea the sun would reflect that way, unexpected lens flare, sudden rain, people getting in the way, etc.

One classic scenario: Paced the subject, hauled ass to get well ahead of it, parked in a safe place, and able to set up within a comfortable period. Then, it slowly comes to a stop, and I'm thinking 'crap...now what?' Along comes an unexpected move on adjacent track, which fouls the view. Light begins to fade, and the subject still doesn't get going again. Then, after a long while, everything starts moving again, but the light has changed, so I try to move/compensate, but it really comes off as second best.

Anymore, just getting enough time, gasoline, and good weather to come into play so I can actually enjoy going out and catching the fish, is greatly appreciated. Getting the shot involves a lot more than just having decent equipment; being happy with it is still another thing. Having the vision to see is a matter of perspective. I like that second shot that some other folks here don't because I like the way the sun and haze are reacting. I think it's far better than a 3/4 wedge view in perfect light. Maybe a polarizing filter would have helped, but maybe that would have caused a slower shutter speed, with the potential for blur. Keep up the good work, I always enjoy looking here on this site for people's work!



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  You Often Ask, "What Camera Do You Use Steve"?, "What Scanner Do You Use Drew"? Those Are the Wrong Questions. Marty 09-03-2010 - 16:52
  Re: You Often Ask, "What Camera Do You Use Steve"?, "What Scanner Do You Use Drew"? Those Are the Wrong Questions. Mikado 09-03-2010 - 17:33
  Re: You Often Ask, "What Camera Do You Use Steve"?, "What Scanner Do You Use Drew"? Those Are the Wrong Questions. Sidewinder 09-04-2010 - 09:24
  Re: You Often Ask, "What Camera Do You Use Steve"?, "What Scanner Do You Use Drew"? Those Are the Wrong Questions. AP Effect? 09-03-2010 - 23:28
  What Steve Sloan didn't tell you . . . Kyle 09-04-2010 - 10:18
  Re: What Steve Sloan didn't tell you . . . WTUTE 09-04-2010 - 10:26
  Re: What Steve Sloan didn't tell you . . . Carol L. Voss 09-04-2010 - 11:14
  Re: What Steve Sloan didn't tell you . . . Dilbert 09-04-2010 - 15:32
  Re: What Steve Sloan didn't tell you . . . Ben Weitz 09-04-2010 - 16:05
  Re: What Steve Sloan didn't tell you . . . MP 44.7 09-04-2010 - 19:38
  Re: What is also an issue Severe Duty 09-05-2010 - 09:33
  Unintended consequences Copy19 09-06-2010 - 06:54
  Re: Unintended consequences Copy19 09-06-2010 - 06:57
  Re: Unintended consequences John West 09-06-2010 - 11:00
  Re: Unintended consequences Steve Thompson 09-06-2010 - 15:30
  Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Steve Sloan 09-06-2010 - 18:33
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Steve Thompson 09-06-2010 - 19:15
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Steve Sloan 09-06-2010 - 20:31
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really George Andrews 09-06-2010 - 19:26
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Steve Sloan 09-06-2010 - 20:32
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Tom Moungovan 09-07-2010 - 13:52
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really mook 09-07-2010 - 14:39
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Bruce Kelly 09-07-2010 - 16:11
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Steve Sloan 09-07-2010 - 18:58
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Bruce Kelly 09-07-2010 - 20:57
  Re: Much More Than You Want To Know, Really Steve Sloan 09-08-2010 - 11:15
  My "Book" Is Here Steve Sloan 09-08-2010 - 11:22
  Re: My "Book" Is Here Bruce Kelly 09-08-2010 - 13:24
  Re: My "Book" Is Here OldPoleBurner 09-08-2010 - 19:21
  Re: My "Book" Is Here Captain Underpants 09-08-2010 - 19:47
  Re: My "Book" Is Here George Andrews 09-08-2010 - 20:15
  Re: My "Book" Is Here Tom Moungovan 09-09-2010 - 06:56


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **         **     **   *******   **     ** 
 **     **  **    **   **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **     **  **    **   **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 *********  **    **   **     **   ********  ********* 
 **     **  *********   **   **          **  **     ** 
 **     **        **     ** **    **     **  **     ** 
 **     **        **      ***      *******   **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com